108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16803557)
1. Magnetic resonance imaging-assisted FIGO staging system for cervical cancer.
Soutter WP; deSouza N
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2006; 16(3):1487; author reply 1488. PubMed ID: 16803557
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Arguments for a magnetic resonance imaging-assisted FIGO staging system for cervical cancer.
Narayan K
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2005; 15(4):573-82. PubMed ID: 16014109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Revised FIGO Staging for Cervical Cancer - A New Role for MRI.
Merz J; Bossart M; Bamberg F; Eisenblaetter M
Rofo; 2020 Oct; 192(10):937-944. PubMed ID: 32731266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Staging of cervix cancer using MRT].
Einspieler R; Ebner F; Hofmann HM; Ranner G; Tamussino K; Justich E
Rofo; 1990 Jan; 152(1):67-70. PubMed ID: 2154013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Role of imaging in pretreatment evaluation of early invasive cervical cancer: results of the intergroup study American College of Radiology Imaging Network 6651-Gynecologic Oncology Group 183.
Hricak H; Gatsonis C; Chi DS; Amendola MA; Brandt K; Schwartz LH; Koelliker S; Siegelman ES; Brown JJ; McGhee RB; Iyer R; Vitellas KM; Snyder B; Long HJ; Fiorica JV; Mitchell DG; ;
J Clin Oncol; 2005 Dec; 23(36):9329-37. PubMed ID: 16361632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Role of magnetic resonance imaging as an adjunct to clinical staging in cervical carcinoma.
Bhosale P; Peungjesada S; Devine C; Balachandran A; Iyer R
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010; 34(6):855-64. PubMed ID: 21084900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MR imaging of cervical carcinoma: a practical staging approach.
Nicolet V; Carignan L; Bourdon F; Prosmanne O
Radiographics; 2000; 20(6):1539-49. PubMed ID: 11112809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Invasive carcinoma of the cervix uteri (stage IB-IIB): evaluation using magnetic resonance].
Sironi S; Belloni C; Taccagni L; Del Maschio A
Radiol Med; 1990 Sep; 80(3):314-20. PubMed ID: 2236692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Primary uterine cervical cancer: correlation of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and clinical staging (FIGO) with histopathology findings.
Kraljević Z; Visković K; Ledinsky M; Zadravec D; Grbavac I; Bilandzija M; Soljacić-Vranes H; Kuna K; Klasnić K; Krolo I
Coll Antropol; 2013 Jun; 37(2):561-8. PubMed ID: 23941005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Patterns of failure and prognostic factor analyses in locally advanced cervical cancer patients staged by magnetic resonance imaging and treated with curative intent.
Narayan K; Fisher RJ; Bernshaw D
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2008; 18(3):525-33. PubMed ID: 18476950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MR staging accuracy for endometrial cancer based on the new FIGO stage.
Shin KE; Park BK; Kim CK; Bae DS; Song SY; Kim B
Acta Radiol; 2011 Sep; 52(7):818-24. PubMed ID: 21742787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MRI and PET/CT for triaging stage IB clinically operable cervical cancer to appropriate therapy: decision analysis to assess patient outcomes.
Pandharipande PV; Choy G; del Carmen MG; Gazelle GS; Russell AH; Lee SI
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Mar; 192(3):802-14. PubMed ID: 19234280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mapping the extent of disease by multislice computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and sentinel node evaluation in stage I and II cervical carcinoma.
Rajaram S; Sharma H; Bhargava SK; Tripathi RP; Goel N; Mehta S
J Cancer Res Ther; 2010; 6(3):267-71. PubMed ID: 21119251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Gynecologic tumors--tumor staging with nanoparticles].
Meyer R
Rofo; 2005 Apr; 177(4):489. PubMed ID: 15838769
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the staging of cervical carcinoma: a pictorial review.
Smith GE; Gormly K
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2008 Oct; 52(5):427-33. PubMed ID: 19032387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Value of 3-D imaging for staging cervical cancers and predicting behavior.
Maruyama Y
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1993 Nov; 27(4):981-3. PubMed ID: 8244833
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Cervical cancer: value of an endovaginal coil magnetic resonance imaging technique in detecting small volume disease and assessing parametrial extension.
deSouza NM; Dina R; McIndoe GA; Soutter WP
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Jul; 102(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 16427688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Magnetic resonance imaging of cervical carcinoma using an endorectal surface coil.
Brocker KA; Alt CD; Gebauer G; Sohn C; Hallscheidt P
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jul; 83(7):1030-1035. PubMed ID: 24794864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [MRI findings of uterine cervical cancer and value of MRI in preoperative staging].
Li XC; Shang JB; Wu XM; Zeng QS; Sun CP; He JX; Zhong ZW; Chen ZS
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2007 Mar; 27(3):352-4. PubMed ID: 17425990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Magnetic resonance staging accuracy for endometrial carcinoma based on different FIGO staging systems].
Zhang YL; Ding GJ; Shi L; Chen YQ
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 May; 93(19):1486-9. PubMed ID: 24029574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
