These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16803710)

  • 1. Comparison of different mobile telephones in Combi40+ users.
    Castro A; Lassaletta L; Bastarrica M; Prim MP; De Sarriá MJ; Gavilán J
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 Jul; 126(7):714-7. PubMed ID: 16803710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Benefits from a mobile telephone adapter in Combi40+ cochlear implant users.
    Castro A; Lassaletta L; Bastarrica M; Perez-Mora R; Josefa De Sarria M; Gavilan J
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Jun; 128(6):661-5. PubMed ID: 18568501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Speech discrimination through telephone in patients implanted with a Combi 40+].
    Castro A; Lassaletta L; Bastarrica M; Prim MP; de Sarriá MJ; Gavilán J
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 2005; 56(6):246-51. PubMed ID: 15999790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Solutions to electromagnetic interference problems between cochlear implants and GSM phones.
    Sorri MJ; Piiparinen PJ; Huttunen KH; Haho MJ
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2006 Mar; 14(1):101-8. PubMed ID: 16562637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ten-year follow-up of a consecutive series of children with multichannel cochlear implants.
    Uziel AS; Sillon M; Vieu A; Artieres F; Piron JP; Daures JP; Mondain M
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):615-28. PubMed ID: 17667770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.
    Donaldson GS; Kreft HA
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mobile and landline telephone performance outcomes among telephone-using cochlear implant recipients.
    Tan BY; Gluth MB; Statham EL; Eikelboom RH; Atlas MD
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Feb; 146(2):283-8. PubMed ID: 21969279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
    Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Telephone use and understanding in patients with cochlear implants.
    Adams JS; Hasenstab MS; Pippin GW; Sismanis A
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2004 Feb; 83(2):96, 99-100, 102-3. PubMed ID: 15008443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of speech perception performance between Sprint/Esprit 3G and Freedom processors in children implanted with nucleus cochlear implants.
    Santarelli R; Magnavita V; De Filippi R; Ventura L; Genovese E; Arslan E
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):304-12. PubMed ID: 19225440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cochllear implants and GSM phone.
    Sorri MJ; Huttunen KH; Välimaa TT; Karinen PJ; Löppönen HJ
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 2001; (52):54-6. PubMed ID: 11318483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. 1-year postactivation results for sequentially implanted bilateral cochlear implant users.
    Wolfe J; Baker S; Caraway T; Kasulis H; Mears A; Smith J; Swim L; Wood M
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):589-96. PubMed ID: 17667768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A phone-assistive device based on Bluetooth technology for cochlear implant users.
    Qian H; Loizou PC; Dorman MF
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2003 Sep; 11(3):282-7. PubMed ID: 14518792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Cochlear implants in elderly: performance outcomes in the long term].
    Marx M; Gutierrez D; Lepage B; Khoury E; Laborde ML; Deguine O; Fraysse B
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2011; 132(4-5):187-91. PubMed ID: 22908538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Recognition of simulated telephone speech by cochlear implant users.
    Fu QJ; Galvin JJ
    Am J Audiol; 2006 Dec; 15(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 17182877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech performance and sound localization in a complex noisy environment in bilaterally implanted adult patients.
    Mosnier I; Sterkers O; Bebear JP; Godey B; Robier A; Deguine O; Fraysse B; Bordure P; Mondain M; Bouccara D; Bozorg-Grayeli A; Borel S; Ambert-Dahan E; Ferrary E
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14(2):106-14. PubMed ID: 18832816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech perception of children with cochlear implants and children with traditional hearing aids.
    Mildner V; Sindija B; Zrinski KV
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2006; 20(2-3):219-29. PubMed ID: 16428240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of programming threshold and maplaw settings on acoustic thresholds and speech discrimination with the MED-EL COMBI 40+ cochlear implant.
    Boyd PJ
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):608-18. PubMed ID: 17086073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech recognition materials and ceiling effects: considerations for cochlear implant programs.
    Gifford RH; Shallop JK; Peterson AM
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(3):193-205. PubMed ID: 18212519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.