246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16803794)
1. Test-retest reliability of in situ unaided thresholds in adults.
Smith-Olinde L; Nicholson N; Chivers C; Highley P; Williams DK
Am J Audiol; 2006 Jun; 15(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 16803794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability and validity of judgments of sound quality in elderly hearing aid wearers.
Narendran MM; Humes LE
Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 12598808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validity and reliability of in-situ air conduction thresholds measured through hearing aids coupled to closed and open instant-fit tips.
O'Brien A; Keidser G; Yeend I; Hartley L; Dillon H
Int J Audiol; 2010 Dec; 49(12):868-76. PubMed ID: 20812890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability of hearing thresholds: computer-automated testing with ER-4B Canal Phone earphones.
Henry JA; Flick CL; Gilbert A; Ellingson RM; Fausti SA
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2001; 38(5):567-81. PubMed ID: 11732834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Test-retest reliability of wideband reflectance measures in infants under screening and diagnostic test conditions.
Vander Werff KR; Prieve BA; Georgantas LM
Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):669-81. PubMed ID: 17804981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fitting range of the BAHA Intenso.
Bosman AJ; Snik FM; Mylanus EA; Cremers WR
Int J Audiol; 2009; 48(6):346-52. PubMed ID: 19925342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability of computer-automated hearing thresholds in cochlear-impaired listeners using ER-4B Canal Phone earphones.
Henry JA; Flick CL; Gilbert A; Ellingson RM; Fausti SA
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2003; 40(3):253-64. PubMed ID: 14582529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Auditory steady-state responses in normal hearing adults: a test-retest reliability study.
D'Haenens W; Vinck BM; De Vel E; Maes L; Bockstael A; Keppler H; Philips B; Swinnen F; Dhooge I
Int J Audiol; 2008 Aug; 47(8):489-98. PubMed ID: 18698523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of cochlear hearing disorders: normative distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements.
Mills DM; Feeney MP; Gates GA
Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):778-92. PubMed ID: 17982366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
Davidson LS
Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical measures of hearing aid directivity: assumption, accuracy, and reliability.
Wu YH; Bentler RA
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 21826003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of ambient acoustic noise on the auditory steady-state response thresholds in normally hearing adults.
Kei J; Smith D; Joseph S; Stopa J; Kang S; Darnell R
Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 17715465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Test-retest reliability of the acoustic stapedial reflex test in healthy neonates.
Mazlan R; Kei J; Hickson L
Ear Hear; 2009 Jun; 30(3):295-301. PubMed ID: 19322092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of RECD transducer when deriving real-ear sound pressure level.
Munro KJ; Millward KE
Ear Hear; 2006 Aug; 27(4):409-23. PubMed ID: 16825890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Verification of in situ thresholds and integrated real-ear measurements.
Digiovanni JJ; Pratt RM
J Am Acad Audiol; 2010; 21(10):663-70. PubMed ID: 21376007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relationship between transducer type and low-frequency hearing loss for patients with ventilation tubes.
Tokar-Prejna S; Meinzen-Derr J
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 70(6):1063-7. PubMed ID: 16364457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Determining the cause of hearing loss: differential diagnosis using a comparison of audiometric and otoacoustic emission responses.
Mills DM
Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):508-25. PubMed ID: 16957501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measuring the real-ear to coupler difference transfer function with an insert earphone and a hearing instrument: are they the same?
Munro KJ; Toal S
Ear Hear; 2005 Feb; 26(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 15692302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Repeatability of high-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing adults.
Dreisbach LE; Long KM; Lees SE
Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):466-79. PubMed ID: 16957498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of 40 Hz auditory steady-state response (ASSR) and cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) thresholds in awake adult subjects.
Tomlin D; Rance G; Graydon K; Tsialios I
Int J Audiol; 2006 Oct; 45(10):580-8. PubMed ID: 17062499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
