327 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16803795)
1. Comparison of performance on the hearing in noise test using directional microphones and digital noise reduction algorithms.
Nordrum S; Erler S; Garstecki D; Dhar S
Am J Audiol; 2006 Jun; 15(1):81-91. PubMed ID: 16803795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effects of noise reduction technologies on the acceptance of background noise.
Lowery KJ; Plyler PN
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Sep; 24(8):649-59. PubMed ID: 24131601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Speech recognition in noise using bilateral open-fit hearing aids: the limited benefit of directional microphones and noise reduction.
Magnusson L; Claesson A; Persson M; Tengstrand T
Int J Audiol; 2013 Jan; 52(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 22928919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of noise source configuration on directional benefit using symmetric and asymmetric directional hearing aid fittings.
Hornsby BW; Ricketts TA
Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 17496669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids.
Ricketts T; Henry P; Gnewikow D
Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):424-39. PubMed ID: 14534412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development and assessment of two fixed-array microphones for use with hearing aids.
Bilsen FA; Soede W; Berkhout AJ
J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 8263830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of multi-channel wide dynamic range compression, noise reduction, and the directional microphone on horizontal localization performance in hearing aid wearers.
Keidser G; Rohrseitz K; Dillon H; Hamacher V; Carter L; Rass U; Convery E
Int J Audiol; 2006 Oct; 45(10):563-79. PubMed ID: 17062498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of transient noise reduction algorithms on speech intelligibility and ratings of hearing aid users.
DiGiovanni JJ; Davlin EA; Nagaraj NK
Am J Audiol; 2011 Dec; 20(2):140-50. PubMed ID: 21940982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears.
Mok M; Grayden D; Dowell RC; Lawrence D
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):338-51. PubMed ID: 16671848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of slow-acting wide dynamic range compression on measures of intelligibility and ratings of speech quality in simulated-loss listeners.
Rosengard PS; Payton KL; Braida LD
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):702-14. PubMed ID: 16197282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effects of high-frequency amplification on the objective and subjective performance of hearing instrument users with varying degrees of high-frequency hearing loss.
Plyler PN; Fleck EL
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Jun; 49(3):616-27. PubMed ID: 16787899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Speech understanding in quiet and in noise with the bone-anchored hearing aids Baha Compact and Baha Divino.
Kompis M; Krebs M; Häusler R
Acta Otolaryngol; 2007 Aug; 127(8):829-35. PubMed ID: 17762993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Phonological mismatch makes aided speech recognition in noise cognitively taxing.
Rudner M; Foo C; Rönnberg J; Lunner T
Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):879-92. PubMed ID: 17982373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Using hearing aid adaptive directional microphones to enhance cochlear implant performance.
Chung K; Zeng FG
Hear Res; 2009 Apr; 250(1-2):27-37. PubMed ID: 19450437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Real-time multiband dynamic compression and noise reduction for binaural hearing aids.
Kollmeier B; Peissig J; Hohmann V
J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):82-94. PubMed ID: 8263832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness: speech in noise and directional hearing effects with bone-anchored hearing and contralateral routing of signal amplification.
Lin LM; Bowditch S; Anderson MJ; May B; Cox KM; Niparko JK
Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):172-82. PubMed ID: 16436986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development of APHAB norms for WDRC hearing aids and comparisons with original norms.
Johnson JA; Cox RM; Alexander GC
Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 19692903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical evaluation of a new hearing aid anti-cardioid directivity pattern.
Mueller HG; Weber J; Bellanova M
Int J Audiol; 2011 Apr; 50(4):249-54. PubMed ID: 21271803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Performance-Perceptual Test (PPT) and its relationship to aided reported handicap and hearing aid satisfaction.
Saunders GH; Forsline A
Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):229-42. PubMed ID: 16672792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Speech reception thresholds in noise and self-reported hearing disability in a general adult population.
Smits C; Kramer SE; Houtgast T
Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):538-49. PubMed ID: 16957503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
