329 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16803949)
1. Diagnostic accuracy of core biopsy for ductal carcinoma in situ and its implications for surgical practice.
Dillon MF; Quinn CM; McDermott EW; O'Doherty A; O'Higgins N; Hill AD
J Clin Pathol; 2006 Jul; 59(7):740-3. PubMed ID: 16803949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predictors of invasive disease in breast cancer when core biopsy demonstrates DCIS only.
Dillon MF; McDermott EW; Quinn CM; O'Doherty A; O'Higgins N; Hill AD
J Surg Oncol; 2006 Jun; 93(7):559-63. PubMed ID: 16705731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mammographic size of ductal carcinoma in situ does not predict the presence of an invasive focus.
Wahedna Y; Evans AJ; Pinder SE; Ellis IO; Blamey RW; Geraghty JG
Eur J Cancer; 2001 Mar; 37(4):459-62. PubMed ID: 11267854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Preoperative clinicopathologic factors and breast magnetic resonance imaging features can predict ductal carcinoma in situ with invasive components.
Lee CW; Wu HK; Lai HW; Wu WP; Chen ST; Chen DR; Chen CJ; Kuo SJ
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Apr; 85(4):780-9. PubMed ID: 26971424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic accuracy and prognostic value of core biopsy in the management of breast cancer: a series of 542 patients.
Richter-Ehrenstein C; Müller S; Noske A; Schneider A
Int J Surg Pathol; 2009 Aug; 17(4):323-6. PubMed ID: 19029173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ductal carcinoma in situ in core biopsies containing invasive breast cancer: correlation with extensive intraductal component and lumpectomy margins.
Dzierzanowski M; Melville KA; Barnes PJ; MacIntosh RF; Caines JS; Porter GA
J Surg Oncol; 2005 May; 90(2):71-6. PubMed ID: 15844190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A mass on breast imaging predicts coexisting invasive carcinoma in patients with a core biopsy diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ.
King TA; Farr GH; Cederbom GJ; Smetherman DH; Bolton JS; Stolier AJ; Fuhrman GM
Am Surg; 2001 Sep; 67(9):907-12. PubMed ID: 11565774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prediction of the presence of invasive disease from the measurement of extent of malignant microcalcification on mammography and ductal carcinoma in situ grade at core biopsy.
O'Flynn EA; Morel JC; Gonzalez J; Dutt N; Evans D; Wasan R; Michell MJ
Clin Radiol; 2009 Feb; 64(2):178-83. PubMed ID: 19103348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nomogram for predicting invasion in patients with a preoperative diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
Lee SK; Yang JH; Woo SY; Lee JE; Nam SJ
Br J Surg; 2013 Dec; 100(13):1756-63. PubMed ID: 24227361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predictors of invasive breast cancer in ductal carcinoma in situ initially diagnosed by core biopsy.
Chan MY; Lim S
Asian J Surg; 2010 Apr; 33(2):76-82. PubMed ID: 21029943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predictors of invasive breast cancer in mammographically detected microcalcification in patients with a core biopsy diagnosis of flat epithelial atypia, atypical ductal hyperplasia or ductal carcinoma in situ and recommendations for a selective approach to sentinel lymph node biopsy.
Catteau X; Simon P; Noël JC
Pathol Res Pract; 2012 Apr; 208(4):217-20. PubMed ID: 22445178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Role of ultrasound and sonographically guided core biopsy in the diagnostic evaluation of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast.
Londero V; Zuiani C; Furlan A; Nori J; Bazzocchi M
Radiol Med; 2007 Sep; 112(6):863-76. PubMed ID: 17891529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Preoperatively diagnosed ductal cancers in situ of the breast presenting as even small masses are of high risk for the invasive cancer foci in postoperative specimen.
Szynglarewicz B; Kasprzak P; Halon A; Matkowski R
World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jul; 13():218. PubMed ID: 26179898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Risk predictors of underestimation and the need for sentinel node biopsy in patients diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ by preoperative needle biopsy.
Park HS; Park S; Cho J; Park JM; Kim SI; Park BW
J Surg Oncol; 2013 Mar; 107(4):388-92. PubMed ID: 23007901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predicting invasion in mammographically detected microcalcification.
Bagnall MJ; Evans AJ; Wilson AR; Pinder SE; Denley H; Geraghty JG; Ellis IO
Clin Radiol; 2001 Oct; 56(10):828-32. PubMed ID: 11895299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Atypical presentations of screen-detected DCIS Implications for pre-operative assessment and surgical intervention.
Farshid G; Downey P; Gill PG
Breast; 2007 Apr; 16(2):161-71. PubMed ID: 17097878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Association of clinical and pathologic variables with lumpectomy surgical margin status after preoperative diagnosis or excisional biopsy of invasive breast cancer.
Smitt MC; Horst K
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1040-4. PubMed ID: 17203329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Core biopsy diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ: an indication for sentinel lymph node biopsy.
Mittendorf EA; Arciero CA; Gutchell V; Hooke J; Shriver CD
Curr Surg; 2005; 62(2):253-7. PubMed ID: 15796952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Lobular neoplasia in breast core needle biopsy specimens is associated with a low risk of ductal carcinoma in situ or invasive carcinoma on subsequent excision.
Renshaw AA; Derhagopian RP; Martinez P; Gould EW
Am J Clin Pathol; 2006 Aug; 126(2):310-3. PubMed ID: 16891208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Factors affecting successful breast conservation for ductal carcinoma in situ.
Dillon MF; Mc Dermott EW; O'Doherty A; Quinn CM; Hill AD; O'Higgins N
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 May; 14(5):1618-28. PubMed ID: 17443388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
