These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16804452)
41. Researchers, authors and reviewers: what are our responsibilities? Kramer MS Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2012 Jul; 26(4):308-9. PubMed ID: 22686381 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. The referee process of The British Journal of Surgery. Farndon JR; Murie JA; Johnson CD; Earnshaw JJ; Guillou PJ Br J Surg; 1997 Jul; 84(7):901-3. PubMed ID: 9240127 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Coxibs supplement: has CCJM sold out? Frisch E Cleve Clin J Med; 2002 Jul; 69(7):568; author reply 568. PubMed ID: 12109641 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Peer reviewed journal articles. Gyles C Can Vet J; 2018 Feb; 59(2):113-115. PubMed ID: 29386669 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Authors, industry, and review articles. DeMaria AN J Am Coll Cardiol; 2004 Mar; 43(6):1130-1. PubMed ID: 15028380 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Scientific authorship. Part 2. History, recurring issues, practices, and guidelines. Claxton LD Mutat Res; 2005 Jan; 589(1):31-45. PubMed ID: 15652225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. On peer review. Schuklenk U Bioethics; 2015 Feb; 29(2):ii-iii. PubMed ID: 25586285 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Challenging the tyranny of impact factors. Colquhoun D Nature; 2003 May; 423(6939):479; discussion 480. PubMed ID: 12774093 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Writing an effective response to reviewers: the goal is to improve the study and get it published! Patino CM; Ferreira JC J Bras Pneumol; 2019 Feb; 45(1):e20190020. PubMed ID: 30843955 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. A case of plagiarism: lessons for editors, authors, reviewers, readers, and plagiarists. Alspach JG Crit Care Nurse; 2014 Oct; 34(5):12-6. PubMed ID: 25274760 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Disparities in the geographical distribution of authorship between invited and peer reviewed papers. Carson DP; Eagles JM Scott Med J; 1999 Oct; 44(5):149-51. PubMed ID: 10629912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. European Urology: serving our readership through systematic peer review, use of reporting standards, and encouragement of postpublication review. Catto JW; Cooperberg MR; Cornu JN; Gratzke C; Novara G; Shariat SF; Vickers A Eur Urol; 2015 Feb; 67(2):188-90. PubMed ID: 25175422 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Journal reviewing: is it in need of reform? Paniagua H Br J Nurs; 2003 Jul 24-Aug 13; 12(14):836; author reply 836. PubMed ID: 12959077 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]