BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16804554)

  • 1. The value of gene-based selection of tag SNPs in genome-wide association studies.
    Wiltshire S; de Bakker PI; Daly MJ
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2006 Nov; 14(11):1209-14. PubMed ID: 16804554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transferability of tag SNPs in genetic association studies in multiple populations.
    de Bakker PI; Burtt NP; Graham RR; Guiducci C; Yelensky R; Drake JA; Bersaglieri T; Penney KL; Butler J; Young S; Onofrio RC; Lyon HN; Stram DO; Haiman CA; Freedman ML; Zhu X; Cooper R; Groop L; Kolonel LN; Henderson BE; Daly MJ; Hirschhorn JN; Altshuler D
    Nat Genet; 2006 Nov; 38(11):1298-303. PubMed ID: 17057720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Singleton SNPs in the human genome and implications for genome-wide association studies.
    Ke X; Taylor MS; Cardon LR
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2008 Apr; 16(4):506-15. PubMed ID: 18197193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genome-wide selection of tag SNPs using multiple-marker correlation.
    Hao K
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Dec; 23(23):3178-84. PubMed ID: 18006555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A gene-centric approach to genome-wide association studies.
    Jorgenson E; Witte JS
    Nat Rev Genet; 2006 Nov; 7(11):885-91. PubMed ID: 17047687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detailed analysis of the relative power of direct and indirect association studies and the implications for their interpretation.
    Moskvina V; O'Donovan MC
    Hum Hered; 2007; 64(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 17483598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An evaluation of HapMap sample size and tagging SNP performance in large-scale empirical and simulated data sets.
    Zeggini E; Rayner W; Morris AP; Hattersley AT; Walker M; Hitman GA; Deloukas P; Cardon LR; McCarthy MI
    Nat Genet; 2005 Dec; 37(12):1320-2. PubMed ID: 16258542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficiency and power in genetic association studies.
    de Bakker PI; Yelensky R; Pe'er I; Gabriel SB; Daly MJ; Altshuler D
    Nat Genet; 2005 Nov; 37(11):1217-23. PubMed ID: 16244653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A worldwide survey of haplotype variation and linkage disequilibrium in the human genome.
    Conrad DF; Jakobsson M; Coop G; Wen X; Wall JD; Rosenberg NA; Pritchard JK
    Nat Genet; 2006 Nov; 38(11):1251-60. PubMed ID: 17057719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Transferability of tag SNPs to capture common genetic variation in DNA repair genes across multiple populations.
    De Bakker PI; Graham RR; Altshuler D; Henderson BE; Haiman CA
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 2006; ():478-86. PubMed ID: 17094262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating coverage of genome-wide association studies.
    Barrett JC; Cardon LR
    Nat Genet; 2006 Jun; 38(6):659-62. PubMed ID: 16715099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of genome-wide power of genetic association studies based on empirical data from the HapMap project.
    Nannya Y; Taura K; Kurokawa M; Chiba S; Ogawa S
    Hum Mol Genet; 2007 Oct; 16(20):2494-505. PubMed ID: 17666406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genomic organization and sequence variation of the human integrin subunit alpha8 gene (ITGA8).
    Ekwa-Ekoka C; Diaz GA; Carlson C; Hasegawa T; Samudrala R; Lim KC; Yabu JM; Levy B; Schnapp LM
    Matrix Biol; 2004 Nov; 23(7):487-96. PubMed ID: 15579315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of tagging methods and their tagging space.
    Ke X; Miretti MM; Broxholme J; Hunt S; Beck S; Bentley DR; Deloukas P; Cardon LR
    Hum Mol Genet; 2005 Sep; 14(18):2757-67. PubMed ID: 16103130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficacy assessment of SNP sets for genome-wide disease association studies.
    Wollstein A; Herrmann A; Wittig M; Nothnagel M; Franke A; Nürnberg P; Schreiber S; Krawczak M; Hampe J
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2007; 35(17):e113. PubMed ID: 17726055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating and improving power in whole-genome association studies using fixed marker sets.
    Pe'er I; de Bakker PI; Maller J; Yelensky R; Altshuler D; Daly MJ
    Nat Genet; 2006 Jun; 38(6):663-7. PubMed ID: 16715096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Increased gene coverage and Alu frequency in large linkage disequilibrium blocks of the human genome.
    Wang Y; Fong PY; Leung FC; Mak W; Sham PC
    Genet Mol Res; 2007 Dec; 6(4):1131-41. PubMed ID: 18273807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Linkage disequilibrium of evolutionarily conserved regions in the human genome.
    Kato M; Sekine A; Ohnishi Y; Johnson TA; Tanaka T; Nakamura Y; Tsunoda T
    BMC Genomics; 2006 Dec; 7():326. PubMed ID: 17192199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of coverage variation of SNP chips for genome-wide association studies.
    Li M; Li C; Guan W
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2008 May; 16(5):635-43. PubMed ID: 18253166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Navigating the HapMap.
    Barnes MR
    Brief Bioinform; 2006 Sep; 7(3):211-24. PubMed ID: 16877472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.