These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16805373)

  • 21. Speech recognition in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of standard HiRes and HiRes 120 sound processing.
    Firszt JB; Holden LK; Reeder RM; Skinner MW
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Feb; 30(2):146-52. PubMed ID: 19106769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of the high-resolution speech coding strategy for the Clarion CII cochlear implant system.
    Ostroff JM; David EA; Shipp DB; Chen JM; Nedzelski JM
    J Otolaryngol; 2003 Apr; 32(2):81-6. PubMed ID: 12866591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Benefits of the HiRes 120 coding strategy combined with the Harmony processor in an adult European multicentre study.
    Büchner A; Lenarz T; Boermans PP; Frijns JH; Mancini P; Filipo R; Fielden C; Cooper H; Eklöf M; Freijd A; Lombaard S; Meerton L; Pickerill M; Vanat Z; Wesarg T; Aschendorff A; Kienast B; Boyle P; Arnold L; Meyer B; Sterkers O; Müller-Deile J; Ambrosch P; Helbig S; Frachet B; Gallego S; Truy E; Jeffs E; Morant A; Marco J
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Feb; 132(2):179-87. PubMed ID: 22074015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of pulse width, pulse rate and paired electrode stimulation on psychophysical measures of dynamic range and speech recognition in cochlear implants.
    Bonnet RM; Boermans PP; Avenarius OF; Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):489-96. PubMed ID: 22517184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Use of S-shaped input-output functions for noise suppression in cochlear implants.
    Kasturi K; Loizou PC
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):402-11. PubMed ID: 17485989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Advanced Bionics High Resolution Mode: stimulation rates up to 5000 pps.
    Buechner A; Frohne-Büchner C; Gaertner L; Stoever T; Battmer RD; Lenarz T
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2010; 130(1):114-23. PubMed ID: 19479460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Everyday listening questionnaire: correlation between subjective hearing and objective performance.
    Brendel M; Frohne-Buechner C; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz T; Buechner A
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 Jan; 15(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 23998527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An attempt to improve bilateral cochlear implants by increasing the distance between electrodes and providing complementary information to the two ears.
    Tyler RS; Witt SA; Dunn CC; Perreau A; Parkinson AJ; Wilson BS
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Jan; 21(1):52-65. PubMed ID: 20085200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Speech perception results in children implanted with Clarion devices: Hi-Resolution and Standard Resolution modes.
    Bosco E; D'Agosta L; Mancini P; Traisci G; D'Elia C; Filipo R
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Feb; 125(2):148-58. PubMed ID: 15880945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Long-term performance of Clarion 1.0 cochlear implant users.
    Ruffin CV; Tyler RS; Witt SA; Dunn CC; Gantz BJ; Rubinstein JT
    Laryngoscope; 2007 Jul; 117(7):1183-90. PubMed ID: 17603317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Influence of signal processing strategy in auditory abilities.
    Melo TM; Bevilacqua MC; Costa OA; Moret AL
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2013; 79(5):629-35. PubMed ID: 24141681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Speech understanding with the CIS and the n-of-m strategy in the MED-EL COMBI 40+ system.
    Ziese M; Stützel A; von Specht H; Begall K; Freigang B; Sroka S; Nopp P
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2000; 62(6):321-9. PubMed ID: 11054016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Clinical evaluation of higher stimulation rates in the nucleus research platform 8 system.
    Plant K; Holden L; Skinner M; Arcaroli J; Whitford L; Law MA; Nel E
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):381-93. PubMed ID: 17485987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Current steering and results from novel speech coding strategies.
    Buechner A; Brendel M; Krüeger B; Frohne-Büchner C; Nogueira W; Edler B; Lenarz T
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Feb; 29(2):203-7. PubMed ID: 18223448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Simultaneous bilateral cochlear implantation in adults: a multicenter clinical study.
    Litovsky R; Parkinson A; Arcaroli J; Sammeth C
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):714-31. PubMed ID: 17086081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Performance of subjects fit with the Advanced Bionics CII and Nucleus 3G cochlear implant devices.
    Spahr AJ; Dorman MF
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 May; 130(5):624-8. PubMed ID: 15148187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effect of front-end processing on cochlear implant performance of children.
    Wolfe J; Schafer EC; John A; Hudson M
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Jun; 32(4):533-8. PubMed ID: 21436756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A daily alternating method for comparing different signal-processing strategies in hearing aids and in cochlear implants.
    Tyler RS; Witt SA; Dunn CC; Perreau AE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 May; 19(5):443-54. PubMed ID: 19253815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Use of intonation contours for speech recognition in noise by cochlear implant recipients.
    Meister H; Landwehr M; Pyschny V; Grugel L; Walger M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 May; 129(5):EL204-9. PubMed ID: 21568376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.