These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16805674)

  • 1. Study design for calibration of clinical examiners measuring periodontal parameters.
    Hill EG; Slate EH; Wiegand RE; Grossi SG; Salinas CF
    J Periodontol; 2006 Jul; 77(7):1129-41. PubMed ID: 16805674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Discovering factors influencing examiner agreement for periodontal measures.
    Slate EH; Hill EG
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2012 Feb; 40 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):21-7. PubMed ID: 22369705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measurement of clinical attachment levels using a constant-force periodontal probe modified to detect the cemento-enamel junction.
    Preshaw PM; Kupp L; Hefti AF; Mariotti A
    J Clin Periodontol; 1999 Jul; 26(7):434-40. PubMed ID: 10412847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Examiner alignment and assessment in clinical periodontal research.
    Hefti AF; Preshaw PM
    Periodontol 2000; 2012 Jun; 59(1):41-60. PubMed ID: 22507059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sources of error for periodontal probing measurements.
    Grossi SG; Dunford RG; Ho A; Koch G; Machtei EE; Genco RJ
    J Periodontal Res; 1996 Jul; 31(5):330-6. PubMed ID: 8858537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of probing attachment levels using a CEJ probe versus traditional probes.
    Karpinia K; Magnusson I; Gibbs C; Yang MC
    J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Mar; 31(3):173-6. PubMed ID: 15016020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reproducibility of probing depth measurement using a constant-force electronic probe: analysis of inter- and intraexaminer variability.
    Araujo MW; Hovey KM; Benedek JR; Grossi SG; Dorn J; Wactawski-Wende J; Genco RJ; Trevisan M
    J Periodontol; 2003 Dec; 74(12):1736-40. PubMed ID: 14974813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reliability of attachment loss measurements in a longitudinal clinical trial.
    Best AM; Burmeister JA; Gunsolley JC; Brooks CN; Schenkein HA
    J Clin Periodontol; 1990 Sep; 17(8):564-9. PubMed ID: 2212086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detection of the cemento-enamel junction with three different probes: an "in vitro" model.
    Barendregt DS; van der Velden U; Timmerman MF; Bulthuis HM; van der Weijden F
    J Clin Periodontol; 2009 Mar; 36(3):212-8. PubMed ID: 19196382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reproducibility of Manual Periodontal Probing Following a Comprehensive Standardization and Calibration Training Program.
    Fitzgerald BP; Hawley CE; Harrold CQ; Garrett JS; Polson AM; Rams TE
    J Oral Biol (Northborough); 2022 Jun; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 36225716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability of clinical attachment level recordings: effects on prevalence, extent, and severity estimates.
    López R; Retamales C; Contreras C; Montes JL; Marin A; Vaeth M; Baelum V
    J Periodontol; 2003 Apr; 74(4):512-20. PubMed ID: 12747457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Periodontal assessment by right- and left-handed examiners: is there a difference?
    Khan SM; Blanchard SB; Dowsett SA; Eckert GJ; Kowolik MJ
    J Periodontol; 2006 Jul; 77(7):1099-103. PubMed ID: 16805670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of measurement variability using a standard and constant force periodontal probe.
    Osborn J; Stoltenberg J; Huso B; Aeppli D; Pihlstrom B
    J Periodontol; 1990 Aug; 61(8):497-503. PubMed ID: 2391627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Errors in measuring parameters associated with periodontal health and disease.
    Kingman A; Löe H; Anerud A; Boysen H
    J Periodontol; 1991 Aug; 62(8):477-86. PubMed ID: 1920014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The rate of periodontal attachment loss in subjects with established periodontitis.
    Machtei EE; Norderyd J; Koch G; Dunford R; Grossi S; Genco RJ
    J Periodontol; 1993 Aug; 64(8):713-8. PubMed ID: 8410609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of measurement variability in subjects with moderate periodontitis using a conventional and constant force periodontal probe.
    Osborn JB; Stoltenberg JL; Huso BA; Aeppli DM; Pihlstrom BL
    J Periodontol; 1992 Apr; 63(4):283-9. PubMed ID: 1573541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of different types of smoking habits on periodontal attachment.
    Ashril NY; Al-Sulamani A
    J Int Acad Periodontol; 2003 Apr; 5(2):41-6. PubMed ID: 12760505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intra - and inter-examiner reproducibility in constant force probing.
    Wang SF; Leknes KN; Zimmerman GJ; Sigurdsson TJ; Wikesjö UM; Selvig KA
    J Clin Periodontol; 1995 Dec; 22(12):918-22. PubMed ID: 8613559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy and reproducibility of two manual periodontal probes. An in vitro study.
    Buduneli E; Aksoy O; Köse T; Atilla G
    J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Oct; 31(10):815-9. PubMed ID: 15367182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reproducibility of periodontal probing using a conventional manual and an automated force-controlled electronic probe.
    Wang SF; Leknes KN; Zimmerman GJ; Sigurdsson TJ; Wikesjö UM; Selvig KA
    J Periodontol; 1995 Jan; 66(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 7891248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.