272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16805688)
1. Digital volume tomography in the diagnosis of peri-implant defects: an in vitro study on native pig mandibles.
Mengel R; Kruse B; Flores-de-Jacoby L
J Periodontol; 2006 Jul; 77(7):1234-41. PubMed ID: 16805688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Digital volume tomography in the diagnosis of periodontal defects: an in vitro study on native pig and human mandibles.
Mengel R; Candir M; Shiratori K; Flores-de-Jacoby L
J Periodontol; 2005 May; 76(5):665-73. PubMed ID: 15898924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detection of peri-implant bone defects with different radiographic techniques - a human cadaver study.
Kühl S; Zürcher S; Zitzmann NU; Filippi A; Payer M; Dagassan-Berndt D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 May; 27(5):529-34. PubMed ID: 26059443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiographic assessment of changes in marginal bone around endosseous implants supporting mandibular overdentures.
Batenburg RH; Meijer HJ; Geraets WG; van der Stelt PF
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Jul; 27(4):221-4. PubMed ID: 9780899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography, dental magnetic resonance imaging, and intraoral radiography for detecting peri-implant bone defects at single zirconia implants-An in vitro study.
Hilgenfeld T; Juerchott A; Deisenhofer UK; Krisam J; Rammelsberg P; Heiland S; Bendszus M; Schwindling FS
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Sep; 29(9):922-930. PubMed ID: 30112833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Radiologic study of marginal bone loss around 108 dental implants and its relationship to smoking, implant location, and morphology.
Peñarrocha M; Palomar M; Sanchis JM; Guarinos J; Balaguer J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):861-7. PubMed ID: 15623062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Peri-implant bone loss around posterior mandible dental implants placed after distraction osteogenesis: preliminary findings.
Polo WC; de Araujo NS; Lima YB; Joly JC; Sendyk WR; Cury PR
J Periodontol; 2007 Feb; 78(2):204-8. PubMed ID: 17274707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Are Intraoral Radiographs Accurate in Determining the Peri-implant Marginal Bone Level?
Cassetta M; Di Giorgio R; Barbato E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(4):847-852. PubMed ID: 30025001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic accuracy of CBCT versus intraoral imaging for assessment of peri-implant bone defects.
Song D; Shujaat S; de Faria Vasconcelos K; Huang Y; Politis C; Lambrichts I; Jacobs R
BMC Med Imaging; 2021 Feb; 21(1):23. PubMed ID: 33568085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative analysis of imaging techniques for diagnostic accuracy of peri-implant bone defects: a meta-analysis.
Bohner LOL; Mukai E; Oderich E; Porporatti AL; Pacheco-Pereira C; Tortamano P; De Luca Canto G
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2017 Oct; 124(4):432-440.e5. PubMed ID: 28743664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Digital subtraction radiography for the assessment of changes in peri-implant bone density.
Brägger U; Bürgin W; Lang NP; Buser D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1991; 6(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 1809671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of peri-implant defects at titanium and zirconium dioxide implants by means of periapical radiographs and cone beam computed tomography: An in-vitro examination.
Steiger-Ronay V; Krcmaric Z; Schmidlin PR; Sahrmann P; Wiedemeier DB; Benic GI
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Dec; 29(12):1195-1201. PubMed ID: 30387207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sonography in the diagnosis of peri-implant bone defects: An in vitro study on native human mandibles.
Bykhovsky I; Hildner A; Kripfgans OD; Mengel R
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38837465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic performance of cone beam computed tomography in assessing peri-implant bone loss: A systematic review.
Pelekos G; Acharya A; Tonetti MS; Bornstein MM
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 May; 29(5):443-464. PubMed ID: 29578266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Detectability of experimental peri-implant cancellous bone lesions using conventional and direct digital radiography.
Kavadella A; Karayiannis A; Nicopoulou-Karayianni K
Aust Dent J; 2006 Jun; 51(2):180-6. PubMed ID: 16848268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Peri-implant assessment via cone beam computed tomography and digital periapical radiography: an ex vivo study.
Silveira-Neto N; Flores ME; De Carli JP; Costa MD; Matos FS; Paranhos LR; Linden MSS
Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2017 Nov; 72(11):708-713. PubMed ID: 29236918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of cone beam dental CT, intraoral digital and conventional film radiography for the detection of periapical lesions. An ex vivo study in pig jaws.
Stavropoulos A; Wenzel A
Clin Oral Investig; 2007 Mar; 11(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 17048029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Rotational panoramic versus intraoral rectangular radiographs for evaluation of peri-implant bone loss in the anterior atrophic mandible.
Zechner W; Watzak G; Gahleitner A; Busenlechner D; Tepper G; Watzek G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(6):873-8. PubMed ID: 14696663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Are intraoral radiographs reliable in determining peri-implant marginal bone level changes? The correlation between open surgical measurements and peri-apical radiographs.
Cassetta M; Di Giorgio R; Barbato E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Oct; 47(10):1358-1364. PubMed ID: 29866412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of the diagnostic advantages of panoramic radiography and computed tomography scanning for placement of root form dental implants.
Reddy MS; Mayfield-Donahoo T; Vanderven FJ; Jeffcoat MK
Clin Oral Implants Res; 1994 Dec; 5(4):229-38. PubMed ID: 7640337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
