355 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16805691)
1. Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography for periodontal defect measurements.
Misch KA; Yi ES; Sarment DP
J Periodontol; 2006 Jul; 77(7):1261-6. PubMed ID: 16805691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Detection of periodontal bone loss using digital intraoral and cone beam computed tomography images: an in vitro assessment of bony and/or infrabony defects.
Vandenberghe B; Jacobs R; Yang J
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jul; 37(5):252-60. PubMed ID: 18606746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic validity (or acuity) of 2D CCD versus 3D CBCT-images for assessing periodontal breakdown.
Vandenberghe B; Jacobs R; Yang J
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Sep; 104(3):395-401. PubMed ID: 17613257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro cone beam computed tomography imaging of periodontal bone.
Mol A; Balasundaram A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Sep; 37(6):319-24. PubMed ID: 18757716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of intraoral radiography and cone-beam computed tomography for the detection of periodontal defects: an in vitro study.
Bagis N; Kolsuz ME; Kursun S; Orhan K
BMC Oral Health; 2015 May; 15():64. PubMed ID: 26016804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy and reliability of cone-beam computed tomography for measuring alveolar bone height and detecting bony dehiscences and fenestrations.
Leung CC; Palomo L; Griffith R; Hans MG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4 Suppl):S109-19. PubMed ID: 20381751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ex vivo comparison of CBCT and digital periapical radiographs for the quantitative assessment of periodontal defects.
Ruetters M; Hagenfeld D; ElSayed N; Zimmermann N; Gehrig H; Kim TS
Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Jan; 24(1):377-384. PubMed ID: 31104109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography, dental magnetic resonance imaging, and intraoral radiography for detecting peri-implant bone defects at single zirconia implants-An in vitro study.
Hilgenfeld T; Juerchott A; Deisenhofer UK; Krisam J; Rammelsberg P; Heiland S; Bendszus M; Schwindling FS
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Sep; 29(9):922-930. PubMed ID: 30112833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of linear temporomandibular joint measurements with cone beam computed tomography and digital cephalometric radiography.
Hilgers ML; Scarfe WC; Scheetz JP; Farman AG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):803-11. PubMed ID: 16360924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography with bitewing radiography for detection of periodontal bone loss and assessment of effects of different voxel resolutions: an in vitro study.
Cetmili H; Tassoker M; Sener S
Oral Radiol; 2019 May; 35(2):177-183. PubMed ID: 30484193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance of cone beam computed tomography and conventional intraoral radiographs in detecting interproximal alveolar bone lesions: a study in pig mandibles.
Almeida VC; Pinheiro LR; Salineiro FCS; Mendes FM; Neto JBC; Cavalcanti MGP; Pannuti CM
BMC Oral Health; 2017 Jun; 17(1):100. PubMed ID: 28637451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detection and measurement of artificial periapical lesions by cone-beam computed tomography.
Liang YH; Jiang L; Gao XJ; Shemesh H; Wesselink PR; Wu MK
Int Endod J; 2014 Apr; 47(4):332-8. PubMed ID: 23815501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms.
Kumar V; Ludlow JB; Mol A; Cevidanes L
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Jul; 36(5):263-9. PubMed ID: 17586852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-NewTom).
Lascala CA; Panella J; Marques MM
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Sep; 33(5):291-4. PubMed ID: 15585804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Detection of simulated periodontal bone gain by digital subtraction radiography with tuned-aperture computed tomography. The effect of angular disparity.
Chai-U-Dom O; Ludlow JB; Tyndall DA; Webber RL
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Mar; 30(2):92-7. PubMed ID: 11313728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of jaw dimensional and quality assessments of bone characteristics with cone-beam CT, spiral tomography, and multi-slice spiral CT.
Loubele M; Guerrero ME; Jacobs R; Suetens P; van Steenberghe D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(3):446-54. PubMed ID: 17622012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Evaluation of using cone beam computed tomography as a regular test before and after periodontal regenerative surgery].
Cao J; Meng HX
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2018 Feb; 50(1):110-116. PubMed ID: 29483732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of bone thickness on alveolar bone-height measurements from cone-beam computed tomography images.
Sun Z; Smith T; Kortam S; Kim DG; Tee BC; Fields H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Feb; 139(2):e117-27. PubMed ID: 21300222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Digital method for quantification of circumferential periodontal bone level using cone beam CT.
Fleiner J; Hannig C; Schulze D; Stricker A; Jacobs R
Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Mar; 17(2):389-96. PubMed ID: 22431146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of peri-implant defects at titanium and zirconium dioxide implants by means of periapical radiographs and cone beam computed tomography: An in-vitro examination.
Steiger-Ronay V; Krcmaric Z; Schmidlin PR; Sahrmann P; Wiedemeier DB; Benic GI
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Dec; 29(12):1195-1201. PubMed ID: 30387207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
