These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16805863)

  • 1. Beware misleading cues: perceptual similarity modulates the N2/P3 complex.
    Azizian A; Freitas AL; Parvaz MA; Squires NK
    Psychophysiology; 2006 May; 43(3):253-60. PubMed ID: 16805863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stimulus modality, perceptual overlap, and the go/no-go N2.
    Nieuwenhuis S; Yeung N; Cohen JD
    Psychophysiology; 2004 Jan; 41(1):157-60. PubMed ID: 14693011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Task switching and novelty processing activate a common neural network for cognitive control.
    Barcelo F; Escera C; Corral MJ; Periáñez JA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Oct; 18(10):1734-48. PubMed ID: 17014377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The auditory-evoked N2 and P3 components in the stop-signal task: indices of inhibition, response-conflict or error-detection?
    Dimoska A; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
    Brain Cogn; 2006 Nov; 62(2):98-112. PubMed ID: 16814442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Resisting recently acted-on cues: compatibility of Go/NoGo responses to response history modulates (frontal P3) event-related potentials.
    Freitas AL; Azizian A; Leung HC; Squires NK
    Psychophysiology; 2007 Jan; 44(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 17241136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Brain activities immediately after finding rare targets.
    Fuhong L; Bihua C; Qinglin Z; Chongde L; Jiajin Y; Hong L
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Jan; 430(3):269-74. PubMed ID: 18063305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Subjective and objective probability effects on P300 amplitude revisited.
    Rosenfeld JP; Biroschak JR; Kleschen MJ; Smith KM
    Psychophysiology; 2005 May; 42(3):356-9. PubMed ID: 15943689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perceptual load affects spatial and nonspatial visual selection processes: an event-related brain potential study.
    Barnhardt J; Ritter W; Gomes H
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):2071-8. PubMed ID: 18355882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of stop-signal probability in the stop-signal paradigm: the N2/P3 complex further validated.
    Ramautar JR; Kok A; Ridderinkhof KR
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Nov; 56(2):234-52. PubMed ID: 15518938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electrophysiological correlates of categorization: P300 amplitude as index of target similarity.
    Azizian A; Freitas AL; Watson TD; Squires NK
    Biol Psychol; 2006 Mar; 71(3):278-88. PubMed ID: 16043279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. When cognitive control is calibrated: event-related potential correlates of adapting to information-processing conflict despite erroneous response preparation.
    Freitas AL; Banai R; Clark SL
    Psychophysiology; 2009 Nov; 46(6):1226-33. PubMed ID: 19572903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Self-construal priming modulates visual activity underlying global/local perception.
    Lin Z; Lin Y; Han S
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Jan; 77(1):93-7. PubMed ID: 17884279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Response priming in the Go/NoGo task: the N2 reflects neither inhibition nor conflict.
    Smith JL; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Feb; 118(2):343-55. PubMed ID: 17140848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electrophysiological correlates of detecting a visual target and detecting its absence: the role of feature dimensions.
    Akyürek EG; Dinkelbach A; Schubö A; Müller HJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Sep; 48(11):3365-70. PubMed ID: 20633570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative analysis of event-related potentials during Go/NoGo and CPT: decomposition of electrophysiological markers of response inhibition and sustained attention.
    Kirmizi-Alsan E; Bayraktaroglu Z; Gurvit H; Keskin YH; Emre M; Demiralp T
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1104(1):114-28. PubMed ID: 16824492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mechanisms of deficit of visuospatial attention shift in children with developmental coordination disorder: a neurophysiological measure of the endogenous Posner paradigm.
    Tsai CL; Pan CY; Cherng RJ; Hsu YW; Chiu HH
    Brain Cogn; 2009 Dec; 71(3):246-58. PubMed ID: 19751962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Event-related potentials in adolescents with schizophrenia and their siblings: a comparison with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
    Groom MJ; Bates AT; Jackson GM; Calton TG; Liddle PF; Hollis C
    Biol Psychiatry; 2008 Apr; 63(8):784-92. PubMed ID: 17977520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual categorization during childhood: an ERP study.
    Batty M; Taylor MJ
    Psychophysiology; 2002 Jul; 39(4):482-90. PubMed ID: 12212640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. When and where perceptual load interacts with voluntary visuospatial attention: an event-related potential and dipole modeling study.
    Fu S; Zinni M; Squire PN; Kumar R; Caggiano DM; Parasuraman R
    Neuroimage; 2008 Feb; 39(3):1345-55. PubMed ID: 18006335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Perceptual conflict and response competition: event-related potentials of the stroop effect].
    Bekçi B; Karakaş S
    Turk Psikiyatri Derg; 2009; 20(2):127-37. PubMed ID: 19504363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.