376 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16806616)
1. Migration and cyclic motion of a new short-stemmed hip prosthesis--a biomechanical in vitro study.
Westphal FM; Bishop N; Honl M; Hille E; Püschel K; Morlock MM
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Oct; 21(8):834-40. PubMed ID: 16806616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical evaluation of two types of short-stemmed hip prostheses compared to the trust plate prosthesis by three-dimensional measurement of micromotions.
Fottner A; Schmid M; Birkenmaier C; Mazoochian F; Plitz W; Volkmar J
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Jun; 24(5):429-34. PubMed ID: 19307048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical comparison of newly designed stemless prosthesis and conventional hip prosthesis--an experimental study.
Tai CL; Lee MS; Chen WP; Hsieh PH; Lee PC; Shih CH
Biomed Mater Eng; 2005; 15(3):239-49. PubMed ID: 15912004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantification of implant micromotion, strain shielding, and bone resorption with porous-coated anatomic medullary locking femoral prostheses.
Engh CA; O'Connor D; Jasty M; McGovern TF; Bobyn JD; Harris WH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Dec; (285):13-29. PubMed ID: 1446429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of changes in stem positioning on femoral loading after THR using a short-stemmed hip implant.
Speirs AD; Heller MO; Taylor WR; Duda GN; Perka C
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 May; 22(4):431-9. PubMed ID: 17275151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Primary stability and strain distribution of cementless hip stems as a function of implant design.
Bieger R; Ignatius A; Decking R; Claes L; Reichel H; Dürselen L
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Feb; 27(2):158-64. PubMed ID: 21889243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanics of a new short-stemmed uncemented hip prosthesis: An in-vitro study in human bone.
Westphal FM; Bishop N; Puschel K; Morlock MM
Hip Int; 2006; 16 Suppl 3():22-30. PubMed ID: 19219817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of distal stem geometry on interface motion in uncemented revision total hip prostheses.
Kirk KL; Potter BK; Lehman RA; Xenos JS
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2007 Oct; 36(10):545-9. PubMed ID: 18033566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Initial stability of a new uncemented short-stem prosthesis, Spiron®, in dog bone.
Wiebking U; Birkenhauer B; Krettek C; Gösling T
Technol Health Care; 2011; 19(4):271-82. PubMed ID: 21849737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Load-shift--numerical evaluation of a new design philosophy for uncemented hip prostheses.
Goetzen N; Lampe F; Nassut R; Morlock MM
J Biomech; 2005 Mar; 38(3):595-604. PubMed ID: 15652559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical evaluation of different offset versions of a cementless hip prosthesis by 3-dimensional measurement of micromotions.
Fottner A; Peter CV; Schmidutz F; Wanke-Jellinek L; Schröder C; Mazoochian F; Jansson V
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2011 Oct; 26(8):830-5. PubMed ID: 21536357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanics of a short stem: In vitro primary stability and stress shielding of a conservative cementless hip stem.
Bieger R; Ignatius A; Reichel H; Dürselen L
J Orthop Res; 2013 Aug; 31(8):1180-6. PubMed ID: 23553802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Short-stemmed uncemented femoral component for primary hip arthroplasty.
Morrey BF
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1989 Dec; (249):169-75. PubMed ID: 2582666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Partially cemented AncaDualFit hip stems do not fail in simulated active patients.
Cristofolini L; Erani P; Teutonico AS; Traina F; Viceconti M; Toni A
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Feb; 22(2):191-202. PubMed ID: 17070631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Uncemented femoral revision arthroplasty using the modular revision prosthesis MRP-TITAN revision stem.
Mumme T; Müller-Rath R; Andereya S; Wirtz DC
Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2007 Mar; 19(1):56-77. PubMed ID: 17345027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of the change in stem length on the load transfer and bone remodelling for a cemented resurfaced femur.
Pal B; Gupta S; New AM
J Biomech; 2010 Nov; 43(15):2908-14. PubMed ID: 20728891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Osseointegration of cemented and noncemented implants in artificial hip replacement: long-term findings in man.
Willert HG; Buchhorn GH
J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 1999; 9(1-2):113-30. PubMed ID: 10537584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Migration of two different cementless hip arthroplasty stems in combination with two different heads: a biomechanical in vitro study.
Klestil T; Morlock MM; Schwieger K; Sellenschloh K; Curda B; Biedermann R; Hennerbichler A; Schmoelz W; Rabl W; Blauth M
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2006 Aug; 126(6):387-93. PubMed ID: 16557367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Do short-stemmed-prostheses induce periprosthetic fractures earlier than standard hip stems? A biomechanical ex-vivo study of two different stem designs.
Jakubowitz E; Seeger JB; Lee C; Heisel C; Kretzer JP; Thomsen MN
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2009 Jun; 129(6):849-55. PubMed ID: 18568351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
