1109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16807131)
1. Random-effects model for meta-analysis of clinical trials: an update.
DerSimonian R; Kacker R
Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 Feb; 28(2):105-14. PubMed ID: 16807131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Meta-analysis of summary survival curve data.
Arends LR; Hunink MG; Stijnen T
Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(22):4381-96. PubMed ID: 18465839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of three different models for estimating relative risk in meta-analysis of clinical trials under unobserved heterogeneity.
Kuhnert R; Böhning D
Stat Med; 2007 May; 26(11):2277-96. PubMed ID: 16991109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Statistical analysis of community-based studies -- presentation and comparison of possible solutions with reference to statistical meta-analytic methods].
Twardella D; Bruckner T; Blettner M
Gesundheitswesen; 2005 Jan; 67(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 15672306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of statistical methods for meta-analysis.
Brockwell SE; Gordon IR
Stat Med; 2001 Mar; 20(6):825-40. PubMed ID: 11252006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of one-step and two-step meta-analysis models using individual patient data.
Mathew T; Nordström K
Biom J; 2010 Apr; 52(2):271-87. PubMed ID: 20349448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A model for incorporating historical controls into a meta-analysis.
Begg CB; Pilote L
Biometrics; 1991 Sep; 47(3):899-906. PubMed ID: 1742445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improved tests for a random effects meta-regression with a single covariate.
Knapp G; Hartung J
Stat Med; 2003 Sep; 22(17):2693-710. PubMed ID: 12939780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Combined test procedures in the meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials.
Knapp G; Hartung J
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2000; 77():34-8. PubMed ID: 11187570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Meta-analysis of binary data: which within study variance estimate to use?
Chang BH; Waternaux C; Lipsitz S
Stat Med; 2001 Jul; 20(13):1947-56. PubMed ID: 11427951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Investigating trial and treatment heterogeneity in an individual patient data meta-analysis of survival data by means of the penalized maximum likelihood approach.
Rondeau V; Michiels S; Liquet B; Pignon JP
Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(11):1894-910. PubMed ID: 18069745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Meta-analysis of individual patient data versus aggregate data from longitudinal clinical trials.
Jones AP; Riley RD; Williamson PR; Whitehead A
Clin Trials; 2009 Feb; 6(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 19254930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Meta-analysis of pairs of survival curves under heterogeneity: a Poisson correlated gamma-frailty approach.
Fiocco M; Putter H; van Houwelingen JC
Stat Med; 2009 Dec; 28(30):3782-97. PubMed ID: 19899066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A note on variance estimation in random effects meta-regression.
Sidik K; Jonkman JN
J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(5):823-38. PubMed ID: 16078388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A simple confidence interval for meta-analysis.
Sidik K; Jonkman JN
Stat Med; 2002 Nov; 21(21):3153-9. PubMed ID: 12375296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [A Meta-analysis in multi-center random controlled clinical trials].
Ou AH; Lao YR; Li XQ; Huang Y; He YT; Huang PX
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Apr; 26(4):290-3. PubMed ID: 15941541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A simulation study comparing properties of heterogeneity measures in meta-analyses.
Mittlböck M; Heinzl H
Stat Med; 2006 Dec; 25(24):4321-33. PubMed ID: 16991104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Why add anything to nothing? The arcsine difference as a measure of treatment effect in meta-analysis with zero cells.
Rücker G; Schwarzer G; Carpenter J; Olkin I
Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(5):721-38. PubMed ID: 19072749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in combining results of studies.
Sidik K; Jonkman JN
Stat Med; 2007 Apr; 26(9):1964-81. PubMed ID: 16955539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Confidence intervals for random effects meta-analysis and robustness to publication bias.
Henmi M; Copas JB
Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(29):2969-83. PubMed ID: 20963748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
