BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16808081)

  • 1. Three dimensional stereolithography models of cancellous bone structures from muCT data: testing and validation of finite element results.
    Dobson CA; Sisias G; Phillips R; Fagan MJ; Langton CM
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2006 Apr; 220(3):481-4. PubMed ID: 16808081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of in situ/in vitro three-dimensional quantitative computed tomography image voxel size on the finite element model of human vertebral cancellous bone.
    Lu Y; Engelke K; Glueer CC; Morlock MM; Huber G
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2014 Nov; 228(11):1208-13. PubMed ID: 25500865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A three-dimensional digital image correlation technique for strain measurements in microstructures.
    Verhulp E; van Rietbergen B; Huiskes R
    J Biomech; 2004 Sep; 37(9):1313-20. PubMed ID: 15275838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Finite element models predict cancellous apparent modulus when tissue modulus is scaled from specimen CT-attenuation.
    Bourne BC; van der Meulen MC
    J Biomech; 2004 May; 37(5):613-21. PubMed ID: 15046990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dental application of novel finite element analysis software for three-dimensional finite element modeling of a dentulous mandible from its computed tomography images.
    Nakamura K; Tajima K; Chen KK; Nagamatsu Y; Kakigawa H; Masumi SI
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2013 Dec; 227(12):1312-8. PubMed ID: 24077258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative Computed Tomography Protocols Affect Material Mapping and Quantitative Computed Tomography-Based Finite-Element Analysis Predicted Stiffness.
    Giambini H; Dragomir-Daescu D; Nassr A; Yaszemski MJ; Zhao C
    J Biomech Eng; 2016 Sep; 138(9):0910031-7. PubMed ID: 27428281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Smooth surface meshing for automated finite element model generation from 3D image data.
    Boyd SK; Müller R
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(7):1287-95. PubMed ID: 15922348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Morphology-based prediction of elastic properties of trabecular bone samples.
    Cosmi F
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2009; 11(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 19736904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. From high-resolution CT data to finite element models: development of an integrated modular framework.
    Pahr DH; Zysset PK
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2009 Feb; 12(1):45-57. PubMed ID: 18839383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development of a numerical cancellous bone model for finite-difference time-domain simulations of ultrasound propagation.
    Hosokawa A
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2008; 55(6):1219-33. PubMed ID: 18599410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prediction of mechanical properties of the cancellous bone of the mandibular condyle.
    van Ruijven LJ; Giesen EB; Farella M; van Eijden TM
    J Dent Res; 2003 Oct; 82(10):819-23. PubMed ID: 14514763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficient 3D finite element analysis of dental restorative procedures using micro-CT data.
    Magne P
    Dent Mater; 2007 May; 23(5):539-48. PubMed ID: 16730058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of voxel size-based inaccuracies on the mechanical behavior of thin bone structures.
    Maloul A; Fialkov J; Whyne C
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2011 Mar; 39(3):1092-100. PubMed ID: 21120697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prediction of bone strength by μCT and MDCT-based finite-element-models: how much spatial resolution is needed?
    Bauer JS; Sidorenko I; Mueller D; Baum T; Issever AS; Eckstein F; Rummeny EJ; Link TM; Raeth CW
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jan; 83(1):e36-42. PubMed ID: 24274992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of treatment planning based on stereolithography in computer assisted surgery.
    Schicho K; Figl M; Seemann R; Ewers R; Lambrecht JT; Wagner A; Watzinger F; Baumann A; Kainberger F; Fruehwald J; Klug C
    Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3408-17. PubMed ID: 17022237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Smooth surface micro finite element modelling of a cancellous bone analogue material.
    Leung SY; Browne M; New AM
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2008 Jan; 222(1):145-9. PubMed ID: 18335725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Volume mesh generation and finite element analysis of trabecular bone magnetic resonance images.
    Alberich-Bayarri A; Moratal D; Martí-Bonmatí L; Salmerón-Sánchez M; Vallés-Lluch A; Nieto-Charques L; Rieta JJ
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():1603-6. PubMed ID: 18002278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of finite element models of liver tissue using micro-CT.
    Shi H; Farag AA; Fahmi R; Chen D
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Mar; 55(3):978-84. PubMed ID: 18334389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Numerical simulation of wave propagation in cancellous bone.
    Padilla F; Bossy E; Haiat G; Jenson F; Laugier P
    Ultrasonics; 2006 Dec; 44 Suppl 1():e239-43. PubMed ID: 16859723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of mechanical properties of trabecular and cortical bone.
    Ito M; Koga A; Nishida A; Shiraishi A; Saito M; Hayashi K
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2001; 496():47-56. PubMed ID: 11783625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.