BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16808401)

  • 1. [Ophthalmological assessment of professionally significant functions in persons undergone laser myopia correction].
    Sosnova TL; Loseva EI; Bukhareva EA; Doga AV; Kachalina GF; Pakhomova AL; Zakharova IA
    Gig Sanit; 2006; (3):32-5. PubMed ID: 16808401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Visual field analysis after laser in situ keratomileusis].
    Yuan YS; Zhong H; Zhang BY; Yuan L; Li HY; Li YM
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Mar; 42(3):226-30. PubMed ID: 16643754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of visual results between laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy and epipolis laser in situ keratomileusis to correct myopia and myopic astigmatism.
    Teus MA; de Benito-Llopis L; García-González M
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Sep; 146(3):357-362. PubMed ID: 18614136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. LASEK versus LASIK for the correction of moderate myopia.
    Teus MA; de Benito-Llopis L; Sánchez-Pina JM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Jul; 84(7):605-10. PubMed ID: 17632309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ten-year follow-up of laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia of up to -10 diopters.
    Alió JL; Muftuoglu O; Ortiz D; Pérez-Santonja JJ; Artola A; Ayala MJ; Garcia MJ; de Luna GC
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Jan; 145(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 18154754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Laser in situ keratomileusis versus surface ablation: visual outcomes and complications.
    Ghadhfan F; Al-Rajhi A; Wagoner MD
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Dec; 33(12):2041-8. PubMed ID: 18053901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of implantable collamer lens (ICL) and laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for low myopia.
    Sanders D; Vukich JA
    Cornea; 2006 Dec; 25(10):1139-46. PubMed ID: 17172886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Epi-LASIK and off-flap Epi-LASIK for the treatment of low and moderate myopia.
    Kalyvianaki MI; Kymionis GD; Kounis GA; Panagopoulou SI; Grentzelos MA; Pallikaris IG
    Ophthalmology; 2008 Dec; 115(12):2174-80. PubMed ID: 19041475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Excimer laser refractive correction of myopia after episcleral buckling for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.
    Holopainen JM; Vuori E; Moilanen JA; Zalentein WN; Tervo TM
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Oct; 33(10):1744-9. PubMed ID: 17889770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical investigation of off-flap epi-LASIK for moderate to high myopia.
    Wang QM; Fu AC; Yu Y; Xu CC; Wang XX; Chen SH; Yu AY
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Jun; 49(6):2390-4. PubMed ID: 18515581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A control-matched comparison of laser epithelial keratomileusis and laser in situ keratomileusis for low to moderate myopia.
    Tobaigy FM; Ghanem RC; Sayegh RR; Hallak JA; Azar DT
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Dec; 142(6):901-8. PubMed ID: 17157575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. One-year clinical results after epi-LASIK for myopia.
    Katsanevaki VJ; Kalyvianaki MI; Kavroulaki DS; Pallikaris IG
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Jun; 114(6):1111-7. PubMed ID: 17320960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ten-year follow-up of laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia.
    Alió JL; Muftuoglu O; Ortiz D; Pérez-Santonja JJ; Artola A; Ayala MJ; Garcia MJ; de Luna GC
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Jan; 145(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 17996210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Five-year outcome of LASIK for myopia.
    Kato N; Toda I; Hori-Komai Y; Sakai C; Tsubota K
    Ophthalmology; 2008 May; 115(5):839-844.e2. PubMed ID: 17900692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Change in the accommodative convergence per unit of accommodation ratio after bilateral laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia in orthotropic patients: prospective evaluation.
    Prakash G; Choudhary V; Sharma N; Titiyal JS
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Dec; 33(12):2054-6. PubMed ID: 18053903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Outcomes of LASIK for myopia with FDA-approved lasers.
    Bailey MD; Zadnik K
    Cornea; 2007 Apr; 26(3):246-54. PubMed ID: 17413947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A prospective, contralateral eye study comparing thin-flap LASIK (sub-Bowman keratomileusis) with photorefractive keratectomy.
    Slade SG; Durrie DS; Binder PS
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Jun; 116(6):1075-82. PubMed ID: 19486798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Outcomes of epi-LASIK for the correction of high myopia and myopic astigmatism after more than 1 year.
    Gan D; Zhou X; Dai J; Qu X; Yu Z; Zhou H; Wang X; Chu R
    Ophthalmologica; 2009; 223(2):102-10. PubMed ID: 19052479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. One-year results of photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia using a 213 nm wavelength solid-state laser.
    Tsiklis NS; Kymionis GD; Kounis GA; Pallikaris AI; Diakonis VF; Charisis S; Markomanolakis MM; Pallikaris IG
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Jun; 33(6):971-7. PubMed ID: 17531689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of night driving performance after wavefront-guided and conventional LASIK for moderate myopia.
    Schallhorn SC; Tanzer DJ; Kaupp SE; Brown M; Malady SE
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Apr; 116(4):702-9. PubMed ID: 19344822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.