These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16808558)

  • 1. Objective measures as indicators for facial esthetics in white adolescents.
    Kiekens RM; Maltha JC; van't Hof MA; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul; 76(4):551-6. PubMed ID: 16808558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of objective and subjective measures as indicators for facial esthetics.
    Singh B; Kaur H; Vaz AC; Vinod KS; Taneja L; Gaikwad S
    J Forensic Dent Sci; 2016; 8(3):139-144. PubMed ID: 28123267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison between cephalometric classification methods for sagittal jaw relationships.
    Hurmerinta K; Rahkamo A; Haavikko K
    Eur J Oral Sci; 1997 Jun; 105(3):221-7. PubMed ID: 9249188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Morphological associations between the Angle classes.
    Dibbets JM
    Eur J Orthod; 1996 Apr; 18(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 8670923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Contribution of three dimensional cephalometry in the study of determining morphological parameters for facial esthetics].
    Zribi A; Faure J
    Orthod Fr; 2014 Mar; 85(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 24685249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing skeletal relationships using the cervical vertebral curvature.
    Shaikh A; Khan M; Rashna HS
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2011; 22(4):27-31. PubMed ID: 22360079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An evaluation of the relationship between rest position of the mandible and malocclusion.
    Sperry TP
    Angle Orthod; 1989; 59(3):217-25. PubMed ID: 2774298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Novel method of 3-dimensional soft-tissue analysis for Class III patients.
    Božič M; Kau CH; Richmond S; Ovsenik M; Hren NI
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Dec; 138(6):758-69. PubMed ID: 21130335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Airway volume for different dentofacial skeletal patterns.
    El H; Palomo JM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jun; 139(6):e511-21. PubMed ID: 21640863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A measuring system for facial aesthetics in Caucasian adolescents: reproducibility and validity.
    Kiekens RM; Maltha JC; van 't Hof MA; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Dec; 27(6):579-84. PubMed ID: 16009665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The variability of some craniofacial dimensions.
    Kerr WJ; Ford I
    Angle Orthod; 1991; 61(3):205-10. PubMed ID: 1928822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The inadequacy of the Y-axis of growth (SNGn) for the vertical pattern assessment in patients with sagittal discrepancies.
    Paranhos LR; Brando TM; Kaieda AK; Ramos AL; Torres FC
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Mar; 15(2):169-73. PubMed ID: 25095838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mandibular form and position in 10-year-old boys.
    Kerr WJ; Miller S; Ayme B; Wilhelm N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Aug; 106(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 8059745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Angles of facial convexity in different skeletal Classes.
    Godt A; Müller A; Kalwitzki M; Göz G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Dec; 29(6):648-53. PubMed ID: 17878186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Craniofacial parameters of Syrian children with β-thalassemia major.
    Takriti M; Dashash M
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 May; 2(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 25426607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Objective assessment of the contribution of dental esthetics and facial attractiveness in men via eye tracking.
    Baker RS; Fields HW; Beck FM; Firestone AR; Rosenstiel SF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Apr; 153(4):523-533. PubMed ID: 29602344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Asymmetry of the face in orthodontic patients.
    Haraguchi S; Iguchi Y; Takada K
    Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):421-6. PubMed ID: 18416611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of forehead and neck position on esthetics of class I, II and III profiles.
    Salehi P; Oshagh M; Aleyasin ZS; Pakshir HR
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2014; 9(3):412-25. PubMed ID: 25126620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of first premolar extraction on vertical dimension.
    Kocadereli I
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Jul; 116(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 10393579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Phenotypic diversity in white adults with moderate to severe Class III malocclusion.
    Moreno Uribe LM; Vela KC; Kummet C; Dawson DV; Southard TE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jul; 144(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 23810043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.