These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16808574)

  • 1. Anchorage effect of osseointegrated vs nonosseointegrated palatal implants.
    Chen F; Terada K; Hanada K; Saito I
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul; 76(4):660-5. PubMed ID: 16808574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anchorage effect of various shape palatal osseointegrated implants: a finite element study.
    Chen F; Terada K; Handa K
    Angle Orthod; 2005 May; 75(3):378-85. PubMed ID: 15898376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Anchorage effects of a palatal osseointegrated implant with different fixation: a finite element study.
    Chen F; Terada K; Hanada K; Saito I
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Jul; 75(4):593-601. PubMed ID: 16097228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Three-dimensional modeling and finite element analysis in treatment planning for orthodontic tooth movement.
    Ammar HH; Ngan P; Crout RJ; Mucino VH; Mukdadi OM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jan; 139(1):e59-71. PubMed ID: 21195258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Orthodontic load on short maxillary implants with reduced sink depth: an experimental study.
    Wehrbein H; Göllner P; Diedrich P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Oct; 19(10):1063-8. PubMed ID: 18828823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Maxillary posterior intrusion mechanics with mini-implant anchorage evaluated with the finite element method.
    Çifter M; Saraç M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):e233-41. PubMed ID: 22051501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Finite element analysis of the effect of force directions on tooth movement in extraction space closure with miniscrew sliding mechanics.
    Kojima Y; Kawamura J; Fukui H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Oct; 142(4):501-8. PubMed ID: 22999674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Maxillary molar intrusion with micro-implant anchorage (MIA).
    Park HS; Jang BK; Kyung HM
    Aust Orthod J; 2005 Nov; 21(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 16429869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Finite Element Analysis of Bone Stress for Miniscrew Implant Proximal to Root Under Occlusal Force and Implant Loading.
    Shan LH; Guo N; Zhou GJ; Qie H; Li CX; Lu L
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Oct; 26(7):2072-6. PubMed ID: 26207429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The efficacy of maxillary protraction protocols with the micro-implant-assisted rapid palatal expander (MARPE) and the novel N2 mini-implant-a finite element study.
    Moon W; Wu KW; MacGinnis M; Sung J; Chu H; Youssef G; Machado A
    Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():16. PubMed ID: 26061987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factors controlling anterior torque with C-implants depend on en-masse retraction without posterior appliances: biocreative therapy type II technique.
    Mo SS; Kim SH; Sung SJ; Chung KR; Chun YS; Kook YA; Nelson G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Feb; 139(2):e183-91. PubMed ID: 21300229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of initial displacement and stresses in the maxillary dentition following en masse retraction using fixed lingual appliance and micro-implants: A finite element analysis.
    Aghera D; Shyagali TR; Kambalya P
    Int Orthod; 2019 Sep; 17(3):451-460. PubMed ID: 31302004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Threaded versus porous-surfaced implants as anchorage units for orthodontic treatment: three-dimensional finite element analysis of peri-implant bone tissue stresses.
    Pilliar RM; Sagals G; Meguid SA; Oyonarte R; Deporter DA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(6):879-89. PubMed ID: 17190297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimal palatal configuration for miniscrew applications.
    Lombardo L; Gracco A; Zampini F; Stefanoni F; Mollica F
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Jan; 80(1):145-52. PubMed ID: 19852654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Two distalization methods compared in a novel patient-specific finite element analysis.
    Ammoury MJ; Mustapha S; Dechow PC; Ghafari JG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Sep; 156(3):326-336. PubMed ID: 31474262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Finite element analysis of dental implant as orthodontic anchorage.
    Sarmah A; Mathur AK; Gupta V; Pai VS; Nandini S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Jul; 12(4):259-64. PubMed ID: 22186860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Osseointegrated implants with pendulum springs for maxillary molar distalization: a cephalometric study.
    Onçağ G; Seçkin O; Dinçer B; Arikan F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jan; 131(1):16-26. PubMed ID: 17208102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stress and displacement pattern evaluation using two different palatal expanders in unilateral cleft lip and palate: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Mathew A; Nagachandran KS; Vijayalakshmi D
    Prog Orthod; 2016 Dec; 17(1):38. PubMed ID: 27800592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical effects of corticotomy approaches on dentoalveolar structures during canine retraction: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Yang C; Wang C; Deng F; Fan Y
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Sep; 148(3):457-65. PubMed ID: 26321344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of transpalatal arch on molar movement produced by mesial force: a finite element simulation.
    Kojima Y; Fukui H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Sep; 134(3):335.e1-7; discussion 335-6. PubMed ID: 18774078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.