These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16808582)

  • 21. Effects of Twin-Block and Faramand-LL appliances on soft tissue profile in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Yassaei S; Jamilian A; Joshan N
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2014; 25(4):57-62. PubMed ID: 25745712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Soft tissue changes produced by a banded-type Herbst appliance in late mixed dentition patients.
    de Almeida MR; Flores-Mir C; Brandão AG; de Almeida RR; de Almeida-Pedrin RR
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):121-31. PubMed ID: 18575306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The treatment effects of Invisalign orthodontic aligners: a systematic review.
    Lagravère MO; Flores-Mir C
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2005 Dec; 136(12):1724-9. PubMed ID: 16383056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of soft-tissue profiles after treatment with headgear or Herbst appliance.
    Sloss EA; Southard KA; Qian F; Stock SE; Mann KR; Meyer DL; Southard TE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):509-14. PubMed ID: 18405814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Implant vs screw loading protocols in orthodontics.
    Ohashi E; Pecho OE; Moron M; Lagravere MO
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul; 76(4):721-7. PubMed ID: 16808583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A Class II Division 1 case treated with the Herbst and Edgewise appliances.
    So LL
    Aust Orthod J; 1996 Mar; 14(2):81-6. PubMed ID: 9063114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Mandibular changes produced by functional appliances in Class II malocclusion: a systematic review.
    Cozza P; Baccetti T; Franchi L; De Toffol L; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 May; 129(5):599.e1-12; discussion e1-6. PubMed ID: 16679196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Skeletal, dental and soft-tissue changes induced by the Jasper Jumper appliance in late adolescence.
    Nalbantgil D; Arun T; Sayinsu K; Fulya I
    Angle Orthod; 2005 May; 75(3):426-36. PubMed ID: 15898385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. True molar intrusion attained during orthodontic treatment: a systematic review.
    Ng J; Major PW; Flores-Mir C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Dec; 130(6):709-14. PubMed ID: 17169732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Class II correction in patients treated with class II elastics and with fixed functional appliances: a comparative study.
    Nelson B; Hansen K; Hägg U
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Aug; 118(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 10935954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Perceived facial changes of Class II Division 1 patients with convex profiles after functional orthopedic treatment followed by fixed orthodontic appliances.
    Tsiouli K; Topouzelis N; Papadopoulos MA; Gkantidis N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Jul; 152(1):80-91. PubMed ID: 28651771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Class II correction with the Cantilever Bite Jumper.
    Moro A; Janson G; de Freitas MR; Henriques JF; Petrelli NE; Lauris JP
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Mar; 79(2):221-9. PubMed ID: 19216611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of facial soft tissue changes after treatment with 3 different functional appliances.
    Güler ÖÇ; Malkoç S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2020 Oct; 158(4):518-526. PubMed ID: 32988567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Soft tissue facial profile changes following functional appliance therapy.
    Quintão C; Helena I; Brunharo VP; Menezes RC; Almeida MA
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Feb; 28(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 16113035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Perception of changes in soft-tissue profile after Herbst appliance treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Rego MV; Martinez EF; Coelho RM; Leal LM; Thiesen G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Mar; 151(3):559-564. PubMed ID: 28257740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Facial esthetic outcome of functional followed by fixed orthodontic treatment of class II division 1 patients.
    Zouloumi ME; Tsiouli K; Psomiadis S; Kolokitha OE; Topouzelis N; Gkantidis N
    Prog Orthod; 2019 Nov; 20(1):42. PubMed ID: 31761963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A retrospective cephalometric investigation of two fixed functional orthodontic appliances in class II treatment: Functional Mandibular Advancer vs. Herbst appliance.
    Kinzinger GSM; Lisson JA; Frye L; Gross U; Hourfar J
    Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Jan; 22(1):293-304. PubMed ID: 28365810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Long-term stability of Class II treatment with the Jasper jumper appliance.
    Foncatti CF; Castanha Henriques JF; Janson G; Caldas W; Garib DG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Nov; 152(5):663-671. PubMed ID: 29103444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Prospective clinical trial comparing the effects of conventional Twin-block and mini-block appliances: Part 2. Soft tissue changes.
    Sharma AA; Lee RT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):473-82. PubMed ID: 15821692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.