These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

396 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16808615)

  • 1. Some statistical implications of dose uncertainty in radiation dose-response analyses.
    Schafer DW; Gilbert ES
    Radiat Res; 2006 Jul; 166(1 Pt 2):303-12. PubMed ID: 16808615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimating uncertainty on internal dose assessments.
    Puncher M; Birchall A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 127(1-4):544-7. PubMed ID: 17993651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Common sense about the linear no-threshold controversy-give the general public a break.
    Leonard BE
    Radiat Res; 2008 Feb; 169(2):245-6; author reply 246-7. PubMed ID: 18220465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dosimetry for epidemiological studies: learning from the past, looking to the future.
    Simon SL; Bouville A; Kleinerman R; Ron E
    Radiat Res; 2006 Jul; 166(1 Pt 2):313-8. PubMed ID: 16808617
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How to account for uncertainty due to measurement errors in an uncertainty analysis using Monte Carlo simulation.
    Hofer E
    Health Phys; 2008 Sep; 95(3):277-90. PubMed ID: 18695409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Two principal considerations are needed after low doses of ionizing radiation.
    Feinendegen LE; Paretzke H; Neumann RD
    Radiat Res; 2008 Feb; 169(2):247-8. PubMed ID: 18220467
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Uncertainties in individual doses in a case-control study of thyroid cancer after the Chernobyl accident.
    Drozdovitch V; Maceika E; Khrouch V; Zvonova I; Vlasov O; Bouville A; Cardis E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 127(1-4):540-3. PubMed ID: 17634207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Uncertainty analysis of doses from inhalation of depleted uranium.
    Puncher M; Bailey MR; Harrison JD
    Health Phys; 2008 Sep; 95(3):300-9. PubMed ID: 18695411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Economic and policy considerations drive the LNT debate.
    Mossman KL
    Radiat Res; 2008 Feb; 169(2):245; author reply 246-7. PubMed ID: 18220464
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimating historical radiation doses to a cohort of U.S. radiologic technologists.
    Simon SL; Weinstock RM; Doody MM; Neton J; Wenzl T; Stewart P; Mohan AK; Yoder RC; Hauptmann M; Freedman DM; Cardarelli J; Feng HA; Bouville A; Linet M
    Radiat Res; 2006 Jul; 166(1 Pt 2):174-92. PubMed ID: 16808606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comments on "Dose-response relationships for radicals trapped in irradiated solids" by W. H. Nelson (Radiat. Res. 163, 673-680, 2005).
    Simmons JA
    Radiat Res; 2006 May; 165(5):621-2. PubMed ID: 16669745
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimation of radiation levels by EPR measurement of tooth enamel in Indian populations.
    El-Faramawy NA
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2005 Feb; 62(2):207-11. PubMed ID: 15607450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Compound dual radiation action theory for 252Cf brachytherapy.
    Wang CK; Zhang X
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 110(1-4):801-6. PubMed ID: 15353749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Shared uncertainty in measurement error problems, with application to Nevada Test Site fallout data.
    Li Y; Guolo A; Hoffman FO; Carroll RJ
    Biometrics; 2007 Dec; 63(4):1226-36. PubMed ID: 18078484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lung cancer risk in mice: analysis of fractionation effects and neutron RBE with a biologically motivated model.
    Heidenreich WF; Carnes BA; Paretzke HG
    Radiat Res; 2006 Nov; 166(5):794-801. PubMed ID: 17067205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A reanalysis of thyroid neoplasms in the Israeli tinea capitis study accounting for dose uncertainties.
    Lubin JH; Schafer DW; Ron E; Stovall M; Carroll RJ
    Radiat Res; 2004 Mar; 161(3):359-68. PubMed ID: 14982478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Thyroid cancer following scalp irradiation: a reanalysis accounting for uncertainty in dosimetry.
    Schafer DW; Lubin JH; Ron E; Stovall M; Carroll RJ
    Biometrics; 2001 Sep; 57(3):689-97. PubMed ID: 11550916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Review of methods of dose estimation for epidemiological studies of the radiological impact of nevada test site and global fallout.
    Beck HL; Anspaugh LR; Bouville A; Simon SL
    Radiat Res; 2006 Jul; 166(1 Pt 2):209-18. PubMed ID: 16808609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The autocorrelation coefficient as a tool for assessing goodness of fit between bioassay predictions and measurement data.
    Puncher M; Birchall A; Marsh JW
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 127(1-4):370-3. PubMed ID: 17553862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bias and uncertainty of penetrating photon dose measured by film dosemeters in an epidemiological study of US nuclear workers.
    Daniels RD; Schubauer-Berigan MK
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 113(3):275-89. PubMed ID: 15769802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.