BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

477 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16809389)

  • 1. Effects of replacing the unreliable cDNA microarray measurements on the disease classification based on gene expression profiles and functional modules.
    Wang D; Lv Y; Guo Z; Li X; Li Y; Zhu J; Yang D; Xu J; Wang C; Rao S; Yang B
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Dec; 22(23):2883-9. PubMed ID: 16809389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Independent component analysis-based penalized discriminant method for tumor classification using gene expression data.
    Huang DS; Zheng CH
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Aug; 22(15):1855-62. PubMed ID: 16709589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multiclass cancer classification and biomarker discovery using GA-based algorithms.
    Liu JJ; Cutler G; Li W; Pan Z; Peng S; Hoey T; Chen L; Ling XB
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jun; 21(11):2691-7. PubMed ID: 15814557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A combination of rough-based feature selection and RBF neural network for classification using gene expression data.
    Chiang JH; Ho SH
    IEEE Trans Nanobioscience; 2008 Mar; 7(1):91-9. PubMed ID: 18334459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Kalman filtering for disease-state estimation from microarray data.
    Kelemen JZ; Kertész-Farkas A; Kocsor A; Puskás LG
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Dec; 22(24):3047-53. PubMed ID: 17065158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gene selection in cancer classification using sparse logistic regression with Bayesian regularization.
    Cawley GC; Talbot NL
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Oct; 22(19):2348-55. PubMed ID: 16844704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Structured polychotomous machine diagnosis of multiple cancer types using gene expression.
    Koo JY; Sohn I; Kim S; Lee JW
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Apr; 22(8):950-8. PubMed ID: 16452113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ensemble dependence model for classification and prediction of cancer and normal gene expression data.
    Qiu P; Wang ZJ; Liu KJ
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 21(14):3114-21. PubMed ID: 15879455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Induction of comprehensible models for gene expression datasets by subgroup discovery methodology.
    Gamberger D; Lavrac N; Zelezný F; Tolar J
    J Biomed Inform; 2004 Aug; 37(4):269-84. PubMed ID: 15465480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of microarrays experiments missing values on the stability of gene groups by hierarchical clustering.
    de Brevern AG; Hazout S; Malpertuy A
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 Aug; 5():114. PubMed ID: 15324460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recursive gene selection based on maximum margin criterion: a comparison with SVM-RFE.
    Niijima S; Kuhara S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Dec; 7():543. PubMed ID: 17187691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Avoiding model selection bias in small-sample genomic datasets.
    Berrar D; Bradbury I; Dubitzky W
    Bioinformatics; 2006 May; 22(10):1245-50. PubMed ID: 16500931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Large scale data mining approach for gene-specific standardization of microarray gene expression data.
    Yoon S; Yang Y; Choi J; Seong J
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Dec; 22(23):2898-904. PubMed ID: 17032674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Classification of intramural metastases and lymph node metastases of esophageal cancer from gene expression based on boosting and projective adaptive resonance theory.
    Takahashi H; Aoyagi K; Nakanishi Y; Sasaki H; Yoshida T; Honda H
    J Biosci Bioeng; 2006 Jul; 102(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 16952836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microarray-based classification and clinical predictors: on combined classifiers and additional predictive value.
    Boulesteix AL; Porzelius C; Daumer M
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Aug; 24(15):1698-706. PubMed ID: 18544547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Small, fuzzy and interpretable gene expression based classifiers.
    Vinterbo SA; Kim EY; Ohno-Machado L
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1964-70. PubMed ID: 15661797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Collateral missing value imputation: a new robust missing value estimation algorithm for microarray data.
    Sehgal MS; Gondal I; Dooley LS
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(10):2417-23. PubMed ID: 15731210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ameliorative missing value imputation for robust biological knowledge inference.
    Sehgal MS; Gondal I; Dooley LS; Coppel R
    J Biomed Inform; 2008 Aug; 41(4):499-514. PubMed ID: 18334307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comprehensive vertical sample-based KNN/LSVM classification for gene expression analysis.
    Pan F; Wang B; Hu X; Perrizo W
    J Biomed Inform; 2004 Aug; 37(4):240-8. PubMed ID: 15465477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Constructing the gene regulation-level representation of microarray data for cancer classification.
    Wong HS; Wang HQ
    J Biomed Inform; 2008 Feb; 41(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 17499026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.