These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16810335)

  • 1. Male rats show an indifference-avoidance response for increasing concentrations of the artificial sweetener sucralose.
    Bello NT; Hajnal A
    Nutr Res; 2005 Jul; 25(7):693-699. PubMed ID: 16810335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Female rats show a bimodal preference response to the artificial sweetener sucralose.
    Sclafani A; Clare RA
    Chem Senses; 2004 Jul; 29(6):523-8. PubMed ID: 15269124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rats display a robust bimodal preference profile for sucralose.
    Loney GC; Torregrossa AM; Smith JC; Sclafani A; Eckel LA
    Chem Senses; 2011 Oct; 36(8):733-45. PubMed ID: 21653913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stability of individual differences in sucralose taste preference.
    Bacharach SZ; Calu DJ
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0216431. PubMed ID: 31086418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Examination of the perception of sweet- and bitter-like taste qualities in sucralose preferring and avoiding rats.
    Torregrossa AM; Loney GC; Smith JC; Eckel LA
    Physiol Behav; 2015 Mar; 140():96-103. PubMed ID: 25497078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sensory characteristics and relative sweetness of tagatose and other sweeteners.
    Fujimaru T; Park JH; Lim J
    J Food Sci; 2012 Sep; 77(9):S323-8. PubMed ID: 22908895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Consumption of SC45647 and sucralose by rats selectively bred for high and low saccharin intake.
    Dess NK; Chapman CD; Monroe D
    Chem Senses; 2009 Mar; 34(3):211-20. PubMed ID: 19129238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fat and sugar flavor preference and acceptance in C57BL/6J and 129 mice: experience attenuates strain differences.
    Sclafani A
    Physiol Behav; 2007 Mar; 90(4):602-11. PubMed ID: 17210165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. No detriment in taste response or expression in offspring of mice fed representative levels of sucrose or non-caloric sucralose while pregnant.
    Choo E; Dando R
    Physiol Behav; 2018 Feb; 184():39-45. PubMed ID: 29108962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Activation of the sweet taste receptor T1R3 by sucralose attenuates VEGF-induced vasculogenesis in a cell model of the retinal microvascular endothelium.
    Lizunkova P; Enuwosa E; Chichger H
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2019 Jan; 257(1):71-81. PubMed ID: 30353220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Advantame sweetener preference in C57BL/6J mice and Sprague-Dawley rats.
    Sclafani A; Ackroff K
    Chem Senses; 2015 Mar; 40(3):181-6. PubMed ID: 25560795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Postoral glucose sensing, not caloric content, determines sugar reward in C57BL/6J mice.
    Sclafani A; Zukerman S; Ackroff K
    Chem Senses; 2015 May; 40(4):245-58. PubMed ID: 25715333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Type of sweet flavour carrier affects thyroid axis activity in male rats.
    Pałkowska-Goździk E; Bigos A; Rosołowska-Huszcz D
    Eur J Nutr; 2018 Mar; 57(2):773-782. PubMed ID: 28040879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of Low-Dose Non-Caloric Sweetener Consumption on Gut Microbiota in Mice.
    Uebanso T; Ohnishi A; Kitayama R; Yoshimoto A; Nakahashi M; Shimohata T; Mawatari K; Takahashi A
    Nutrients; 2017 Jun; 9(6):. PubMed ID: 28587159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Short-term consumption of sucralose, a nonnutritive sweetener, is similar to water with regard to select markers of hunger signaling and short-term glucose homeostasis in women.
    Brown AW; Bohan Brown MM; Onken KL; Beitz DC
    Nutr Res; 2011 Dec; 31(12):882-8. PubMed ID: 22153513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Time-intensity profile of pitanga nectar (Eugenia uniflora L.) with different sweeteners: Sweetness and bitterness.
    Freitas ML; de Lima Dutra MB; Bolini HM
    Food Sci Technol Int; 2016 Jan; 22(1):58-67. PubMed ID: 25627677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Supplementation of oligofructose, but not sucralose, decreases high-fat diet induced body weight gain in mice independent of gustducin-mediated gut hormone release.
    Steensels S; Cools L; Avau B; Vancleef L; Farré R; Verbeke K; Depoortere I
    Mol Nutr Food Res; 2017 Mar; 61(3):. PubMed ID: 27800650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of sucralose on flavor sweetness in electronic cigarettes varies between delivery devices.
    Rosbrook K; Erythropel HC; DeWinter TM; Falinski M; O'Malley S; Krishnan-Sarin S; Anastas PT; Zimmerman JB; Green BG
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0185334. PubMed ID: 28968411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Non-caloric sweetener provides magnetic resonance imaging contrast for cancer detection.
    Bagga P; Haris M; D'Aquilla K; Wilson NE; Marincola FM; Schnall MD; Hariharan H; Reddy R
    J Transl Med; 2017 May; 15(1):119. PubMed ID: 28558795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sucralose: From Sweet Success to Metabolic Controversies-Unraveling the Global Health Implications of a Pervasive Non-Caloric Artificial Sweetener.
    Aguayo-Guerrero JA; Méndez-García LA; Solleiro-Villavicencio H; Viurcos-Sanabria R; Escobedo G
    Life (Basel); 2024 Feb; 14(3):. PubMed ID: 38541649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.