These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

66 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16811124)

  • 1. Humphrey kay.
    Slavin G
    J Clin Pathol; 1981 Mar; 34(3):229-31. PubMed ID: 16811124
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Humphrey Melville Edward Kay: an appreciation.
    Slavin G; Lilleyman J
    J Clin Pathol; 2010 Mar; 63(3):283. PubMed ID: 20203235
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do picture-based charts overestimate visual acuity? Comparison of Kay Pictures, Lea Symbols, HOTV and Keeler logMAR charts with Sloan letters in adults and children.
    Anstice NS; Jacobs RJ; Simkin SK; Thomson M; Thompson B; Collins AV
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0170839. PubMed ID: 28152076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Visual Field Measurement with Heidelberg Edge Perimeter and Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer in Patients with Ocular Hypertension.
    Kaczorowski K; Mulak M; Szumny D; Baranowska M; Jakubaszko-Jabłońska J; Misiuk-Hojło M
    Adv Clin Exp Med; 2016; 25(5):937-944. PubMed ID: 28028959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The logMAR Kay picture test and the logMAR acuity test: a comparative study.
    Elliott MC; Firth AY
    Eye (Lond); 2009 Jan; 23(1):85-8. PubMed ID: 17901881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detection of Visual Field Loss in Pituitary Disease: Peripheral Kinetic Versus Central Static.
    Rowe FJ; Cheyne CP; García-Fiñana M; Noonan CP; Howard C; Smith J; Adeoye J
    Neuroophthalmology; 2015 Jun; 39(3):116-124. PubMed ID: 27928344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Humphrey Matrix perimetry in optic nerve and chiasmal disorders: comparison with Humphrey SITA standard 24-2.
    Huang CQ; Carolan J; Redline D; Taravati P; Woodward KR; Johnson CA; Wall M; Keltner JL
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Mar; 49(3):917-23. PubMed ID: 18326712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual-field defects in well-defined retinal lesions using Humphrey and Dicon perimeters.
    Bass SJ; Feldman J
    Optometry; 2000 Oct; 71(10):643-52. PubMed ID: 11063269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing threshold visual fields between the Dicon TKS 4000 automated perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Wong AY; Dodge RM; Remington LA
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1995 Nov; 66(11):706-11. PubMed ID: 8576536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Early glaucoma detection using the Humphrey Matrix Perimeter, GDx VCC, Stratus OCT, and retinal nerve fiber layer photography.
    Hong S; Ahn H; Ha SJ; Yeom HY; Seong GJ; Hong YJ
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Feb; 114(2):210-5. PubMed ID: 17270671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Damato campimetry and Humphrey automated perimetry results in a clinical population.
    Rowe FJ; Sueke H; Gawley SD
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2010 Jun; 94(6):757-62. PubMed ID: 20447958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reoperation of the Kay-Shiley disc valve 35 years after replacement.
    Nakayama S; Nonaka M; Ishida O
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Apr; 79(4):1395-7. PubMed ID: 15797090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical comparison of frequency doubling technology perimetry and Humphrey perimetry.
    Casson R; James B; Rubinstein A; Ali H
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2001 Mar; 85(3):360-2. PubMed ID: 11222348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Discriminating ability of Humphrey matrix perimetry in early glaucoma patients.
    Hong S; Chung W; Hong YJ; Seong GJ
    Ophthalmologica; 2007; 221(3):195-9. PubMed ID: 17440283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of sensitivity and specificity of spatial resolution and Humphrey automated perimetry in pseudotumor cerebri patients and normal subjects.
    Wall M; Conway MD; House PH; Allely R
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1991 Dec; 32(13):3306-12. PubMed ID: 1748561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating the similarity of MMPI-2 and MMPI profiles: reply to Dahlstrom and Humphrey.
    Tellegen A; Ben-Porath YS
    J Pers Assess; 1996 Jun; 66(3):640-4. PubMed ID: 16367693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical evaluation of the Allergan Humphrey 500 autorefractor and the Nidek AR-1000 autorefractor.
    Kinge B; Midelfart A; Jacobsen G
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1996 Jan; 80(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 8664229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparative evaluation of Humphrey perimetry and the multi-channel pattern visual evoked potentials.
    Hu C; Wu L; Wu DZ; Long S
    Yan Ke Xue Bao; 2000 Sep; 16(3):168-71. PubMed ID: 12579641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Learning effect of Humphrey Matrix perimetry.
    Hong S; Na K; Kim CY; Seong GJ
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2007 Oct; 42(5):707-11. PubMed ID: 17823644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Isolated mitral valve replacement with the Kay-Shiley prosthesis. Long-term follow-up and recommendations.
    Bowen TE; Zajtchuk R; Brott WH; deCastro CM
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1980 Jul; 80(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 7382534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.