These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16811285)
1. Behavioral control by an imprinted stimulus. Hoffman HS; Searle JL; Toffey S; Kozma F J Exp Anal Behav; 1966 May; 9(3):177-89. PubMed ID: 16811285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Behavioral control by an imprinted stimulus: long-term effects. Hoffman HS; Kozma F J Exp Anal Behav; 1967 Sep; 10(5):495-501. PubMed ID: 6050060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The control of feeding behavior by an imprinted stimulus. Hoffman HS; Stratton JW; Newby V J Exp Anal Behav; 1969 Nov; 12(6):847-60. PubMed ID: 16811414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reinforcement by an imprinting stimulus versus water on simple schedules in ducklings. Depaulo P; Hoffman HS J Exp Anal Behav; 1981 Sep; 36(2):151-69. PubMed ID: 16812237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Modification of ducklings' filial behavior by aversive stimulation. Ratner AM J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1976 Jul; 2(3):266-84. PubMed ID: 939954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Schedules of electric shock presentation in the behavioral control of imprinted ducklings. Barrett JE J Exp Anal Behav; 1972 Sep; 18(2):305-21. PubMed ID: 4675810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Persistence of acquired behavioral control in the context of imprinting. Eiserer LA; Hoffman HS; Klein SH J Exp Anal Behav; 1975 Nov; 24(3):255-66. PubMed ID: 16811877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of an aversive imprinted stimulus on aggressive behavior. Fields WC J Gen Psychol; 1978 Jan; 98(1st Half):31-5. PubMed ID: 564394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Behavioral contrast in the pigeon: a study of the duration of key pecking maintained on multiple schedules of reinforcement. Schwartz B; Hamilton B; Silberberg A J Exp Anal Behav; 1975 Sep; 24(2):199-206. PubMed ID: 16811872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Two different kinds of key peck in the pigeon: some properties of responses maintained by negative and positive response-reinforcer contingencies. Schwartz B; Williams DR J Exp Anal Behav; 1972 Sep; 18(2):201-16. PubMed ID: 16811623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Training ducklings in broods interferes with maternal imprinting. Lickliter R; Gottlieb G Dev Psychobiol; 1986 Nov; 19(6):555-66. PubMed ID: 3803724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Visual preferences of imprinted ducklings are altered by the maternal call. Johnston TD; Gottlieb G J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1981 Oct; 95(5):663-75. PubMed ID: 7309925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Chicks change their pecking behaviour towards stationary and mobile food sources over the first 12 weeks of life: improvement and discontinuities. Murphy KJ; Hayden TJ; Kent JP PeerJ; 2014; 2():e626. PubMed ID: 25374777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of preliminary magazine training in acquisition of the autoshaped key peck. Davol GH; Steinhauer GD; Lee A J Exp Anal Behav; 1977 Sep; 28(2):99-106. PubMed ID: 16812027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Autoshaping: further study of "negative automaintenance". Woodard WT; Ballinger JC; Bitterman ME J Exp Anal Behav; 1974 Jul; 22(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 16811786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Auto-maintenance in the pigeon: sustained pecking despite contingent non-reinforcement. Williams DR; Williams H J Exp Anal Behav; 1969 Jul; 12(4):511-20. PubMed ID: 16811370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]