These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16811689)

  • 1. Maintenance of key pecking by response-independent food presentation: the role of the modality of the signal for food.
    Schwartz B
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1973 Jul; 20(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 16811689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mechanisms underlying the effects of unsignaled delayed reinforcement on key pecking of pigeons under variable-interval schedules.
    Schaal DW; Shahan TA; Kovera CA; Reilly MP
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1998 Mar; 69(2):103-22. PubMed ID: 9540229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The maintenance of key pecking by stimulus-contingent and response-independent food presentation.
    Gamzu E; Schwartz B
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1973 Jan; 19(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 16811654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Key pecking under response-independent food presentation after long simple and compound stimuli.
    Ricci JA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1973 May; 19(3):509-16. PubMed ID: 16811681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Economic and biological influences on key pecking and treadle pressing in pigeons.
    Green L; Holt DD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Jul; 80(1):43-58. PubMed ID: 13677608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Some variables affecting rate of key pecking during response-independent procedures (autoshaping).
    Perkins CC; Beavers WO; Hancock RA; Hemmendinger PC; Hemmendinger D; Ricci JA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1975 Jul; 24(1):59-72. PubMed ID: 16811864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On conditioned reinforcing effects of negative discriminative stimuli.
    Allen KD; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1989 Nov; 52(3):335-9. PubMed ID: 16812600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A yoked-chamber comparison of concurrent and multiple schedules.
    Killeen P
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1972 Jul; 18(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 16811609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Information on response requirements compared with information on food density as a reinforcer of observing in pigeons.
    Dinsmoor JA; Bowe CA; Green L; Hanson J
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1988 Mar; 49(2):229-37. PubMed ID: 16812538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interactions in multiple schedules: the role of the stimulus-reinforcer contingency.
    Spealman RD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1976 Jul; 26(1):79-93. PubMed ID: 16811933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of delay-interval stimuli on delayed symbolic matching to sample in the pigeon.
    Wilkie DM; Summers RJ; Spetch ML
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1981 Mar; 35(2):153-60. PubMed ID: 16812206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Autoshaping: further study of "negative automaintenance".
    Woodard WT; Ballinger JC; Bitterman ME
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1974 Jul; 22(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 16811786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Second-order autoshaped key pecking based on an auditory stimulus.
    Burt JS; Westbrook RF
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1980 Nov; 34(3):305-18. PubMed ID: 7452133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Punishment of observing by the negative discriminative stimulus.
    Mulvaney DE; Dinsmoor JA; Jwaideh AR; Hughes LH
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1974 Jan; 21(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 16811733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Signalled free-operant avoidance of shock by pigeons pecking a key.
    De Moraes AB; Todorov JC
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1977 Mar; 27(2):281-91. PubMed ID: 16811990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preference for signalled reinforcement.
    Lewis P; Lewin L; Muehleisen P; Stoyak M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1974 Jul; 22(1):143-50. PubMed ID: 16811773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Key pecking of pigeons under variable-interval schedules of briefly signaled delayed reinforcement: effects of variable-interval value.
    Schaal DW; Schuh KJ; Branch MN
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1992 Sep; 58(2):277-86. PubMed ID: 1402602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stimulus control of respondent and operant key pecking: A single key procedure.
    Marcucella H
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1981 Jul; 36(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 16812231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stimulus-food relations and free-operant postponement of timeout from response-independent food presentation.
    Galbicka G; Branch MN
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1983 Sep; 40(2):153-63. PubMed ID: 16812340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cocaine's effects on food-reinforced pecking in pigeons depend on food-deprivation level.
    Schaal DW; Miller MA; Odum AL
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1995 Jul; 64(1):61-73. PubMed ID: 7622982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.