These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16811725)

  • 21. Acquisition and maintenance of autoshaped key pecking as a function of food stimulus and key stimulus similarity.
    Steinhauer GD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1982 Nov; 38(3):281-9. PubMed ID: 7175429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Autoshaping with common and distinctive stimulus elements, compact and dispersed arrays.
    Sperling SE; Perkins ME
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1979 May; 31(3):383-94. PubMed ID: 16812139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Drug effects on the performance of pigeons under a negative automaintenance schedule.
    Poling A; Appel JB
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1979 Jan; 60(2):207-10. PubMed ID: 106431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Discrete-trials spaced responding in the pigeon: the dependence of efficient performance on the availability of a stimulus for collateral pecking.
    Schwartz B; Williams DR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1971 Sep; 16(2):155-60. PubMed ID: 16811538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Autoshaping of key pecking in pigeons with negative reinforcement.
    Rachlin H
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1969 Jul; 12(4):521-31. PubMed ID: 16811371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The disruption of autoshaped key pecking in the pigeon by food-tray illumination.
    Wasserman EA; McCracken SB
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1974 Jul; 22(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 16811785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Drug effects under automaintenance and negative automaintenance procedures.
    Poling A; Appel JB
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1978 Sep; 9(3):315-8. PubMed ID: 714981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Rate and temporal pattern of key pecking under autoshaping and omission schedules of reinforcement.
    Deich JD; Wasserman EA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1977 Mar; 27(2):399-405. PubMed ID: 16812002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Accounting for negative automaintenance in pigeons: a dual learning systems approach and factored representations.
    Lesaint F; Sigaud O; Khamassi M
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(10):e111050. PubMed ID: 25347531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparison of the key-peck and treadle-press operants in the pigeon: differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate schedule of reinforcement.
    Richardson WK; Clark DB
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1976 Sep; 26(2):237-56. PubMed ID: 16811945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effects of d-amphetamine on the automaintained key pecking of pigeons.
    Poling A; Thompson T
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1977 Mar; 51(3):285-8. PubMed ID: 403545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Signal-controlled responding.
    Lewis P; Stoyak M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1979 Jan; 31(1):115-25. PubMed ID: 16812116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Graded differential reinforcement: Response-dependent reinforcer amount.
    Gentry GD; Eskew RT
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1984 Jan; 41(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 16812356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Two types of pigeon key pecking: suppression of long- but not short-duration key pecks by duration-dependent shock.
    Schwartz B
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1977 Mar; 27(2):393-8. PubMed ID: 16812001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A comparison of pecking generated by serial, delay, and trace autoshaping procedures.
    Newlin RJ; Lolordo VM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1976 Mar; 25(2):227-41. PubMed ID: 16811907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Shaping behavioral patterns.
    Locey ML; Rachlin H
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2013 May; 99(3):245-59. PubMed ID: 23426650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Complex dynamic processes in sign tracking with an omission contingency (negative automaintenance).
    Killeen PR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2003 Jan; 29(1):49-61. PubMed ID: 12561133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of varying the percentage of key illuminations paired with food in a positive automaintenance procedure.
    Gonzalez FA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1974 Nov; 22(3):483-9. PubMed ID: 16811811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Autoshaping and automaintenance: a neural-network approach.
    Burgos JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2007 Jul; 88(1):115-30. PubMed ID: 17725055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Controls for and constraints on auto-shaping.
    Bilbrey J; Winokur S
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1973 Nov; 20(3):323-32. PubMed ID: 16811710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.