These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16811736)

  • 1. Preference for and effects of variable-as opposed to fixed-reinforcer duration.
    Essock SM; Reese EP
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1974 Jan; 21(1):89-97. PubMed ID: 16811736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Concurrent variable-interval schedule performance: Fixed versus mixed reinforcer durations.
    Davison M; Hogsden I
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1984 Mar; 41(2):169-82. PubMed ID: 16812365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preference for multiple versus mixed schedules of reinforcement.
    Alsop B; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1986 Jan; 45(1):33-45. PubMed ID: 16812442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sensitivity to reinforcer duration in a self-control procedure.
    White KG; Pipe ME
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1987 Sep; 48(2):235-49. PubMed ID: 16812491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Variable-ratio versus variable-interval schedules: response rate, resistance to change, and preference.
    Nevin JA; Randolph ; Holland S; McLean AP
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 Jul; 76(1):43-74. PubMed ID: 11516115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mechanisms underlying the effects of unsignaled delayed reinforcement on key pecking of pigeons under variable-interval schedules.
    Schaal DW; Shahan TA; Kovera CA; Reilly MP
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1998 Mar; 69(2):103-22. PubMed ID: 9540229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Response strength in multiple periodic and aperiodic schedules.
    Mandell C
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1980 Mar; 33(2):221-41. PubMed ID: 16812166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sensitivity of time allocation to an overall reinforcer rate feedback function in concurrent interval schedules.
    Davison M; Kerr A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1989 Mar; 51(2):215-31. PubMed ID: 16812577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preference and resistance to change with constant- and variable-duration terminal links: independence of reinforcement rate and magnitude.
    Grace RC; Bedell MA; Nevin JA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 May; 77(3):233-55. PubMed ID: 12083678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Preference and resistance to change with constant-duration schedule components.
    Nevin JA; Grace RC
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2000 Jul; 74(1):79-100. PubMed ID: 10966097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Choice, relative reinforcer duration, and the changeover ratio.
    Dunn RM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1982 Nov; 38(3):313-9. PubMed ID: 16812302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Two different kinds of key peck in the pigeon: some properties of responses maintained by negative and positive response-reinforcer contingencies.
    Schwartz B; Williams DR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1972 Sep; 18(2):201-16. PubMed ID: 16811623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the effects of component durations and component reinforcement rates in multiple schedules.
    Charman L; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1982 May; 37(3):417-39. PubMed ID: 16812276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the joint control of preference by time and reinforcer-ratio variation.
    Davison M; Cowie S; Elliffe D
    Behav Processes; 2013 May; 95():100-12. PubMed ID: 23410902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Concurrent schedules: reinforcer magnitude effects.
    Landon J; Davison M; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 May; 79(3):351-65. PubMed ID: 12908762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Resistance to change produced by access to fixed-delay versus variable-delay terminal links.
    Mellon RC; Shull RL
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1986 Jul; 46(1):79-92. PubMed ID: 16812455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Every reinforcer counts: reinforcer magnitude and local preference.
    Davison M; Baum WM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Jul; 80(1):95-129. PubMed ID: 13677611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Choosing among multiple alternatives: Relative and overall reinforcer rates.
    Beeby E; Alsop B
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Sep; 108(2):204-222. PubMed ID: 28758210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does sensitivity to magnitude depend on the temporal distribution of reinforcement?
    Grace RC; Bragason O
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 Mar; 83(2):169-84. PubMed ID: 15828593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Behavior-dependent reinforcer-rate changes in concurrent schedules: A further analysis.
    Davison M; Alsop B
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Jul; 56(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 16812639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.