These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Response-rate invariance in concurrent schedules: effects of different changeover contingencies. Guilkey M; Shull RL; Brownstein AJ J Exp Anal Behav; 1975 Jul; 24(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 16811862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mechanisms underlying the effects of unsignaled delayed reinforcement on key pecking of pigeons under variable-interval schedules. Schaal DW; Shahan TA; Kovera CA; Reilly MP J Exp Anal Behav; 1998 Mar; 69(2):103-22. PubMed ID: 9540229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Changeover behavior and preference in concurrent schedules. Williams BA; Bell MC J Exp Anal Behav; 1996 May; 65(3):513-26. PubMed ID: 16812807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Concurrent performances: stimulus-control gradients during schedules of signalled and unsignalled concurrent reinforcement. Catania AC; Silverman PJ; Stubbs DA J Exp Anal Behav; 1974 Jan; 21(1):99-107. PubMed ID: 16811737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Behavioral contrast in the pigeon: a study of the duration of key pecking maintained on multiple schedules of reinforcement. Schwartz B; Hamilton B; Silberberg A J Exp Anal Behav; 1975 Sep; 24(2):199-206. PubMed ID: 16811872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The role of discriminative stimuli in concurrent performances. Bourland G; Miller JT J Exp Anal Behav; 1981 Sep; 36(2):231-9. PubMed ID: 16812242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Choice of longer or stronger signalled shock over shorter or weaker unsignalled shock. Badia P; Culbertson S; Harsh J J Exp Anal Behav; 1973 Jan; 19(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 16811650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A yoked-chamber comparison of concurrent and multiple schedules. Killeen P J Exp Anal Behav; 1972 Jul; 18(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 16811609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A temporal parameter influencing choice between signalled and unsignalled shock schedules. Harsh J; Badia P J Exp Anal Behav; 1976 May; 25(3):327-33. PubMed ID: 16811916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Response persistence under variable-time schedules following immediate and unsignalled delayed reinforcement. Doughty AH; Lattal KA Q J Exp Psychol B; 2003 Aug; 56(3):267-77. PubMed ID: 12881162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Concurrent performances: synthesizing rate constancies by manipulating contingencies for a single response. Catania AC J Exp Anal Behav; 1972 Mar; 17(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 16811575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Line-orientation generalization following signalled-reinforcer training. Griffin P; Stewart DJ J Exp Anal Behav; 1977 Jan; 27(1):151-60. PubMed ID: 16811972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of alternative reinforcement: does the source matter? Rachlin H; Baum WM J Exp Anal Behav; 1972 Sep; 18(2):231-41. PubMed ID: 16811627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Arousal, changeover responses, and preference in concurrent schedules. McDevitt MA; Williams BA J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Nov; 80(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 14964707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Choice of higher density signalled shock over lower density unsignalled shock. Badia P; Coker C; Harsh J J Exp Anal Behav; 1973 Jul; 20(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 16811694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Signalled free-operant avoidance of shock by pigeons pecking a key. De Moraes AB; Todorov JC J Exp Anal Behav; 1977 Mar; 27(2):281-91. PubMed ID: 16811990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]