These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16811788)

  • 1. Effects of the difference between self and coactor scores upon the audit responses that allow access to these scores.
    Vukelich R; Hake DF
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1974 Jul; 22(1):61-71. PubMed ID: 16811788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Audit responses: responses maintained by access to existing self or coactor scores during non-social, parallel work, and cooperation procedures.
    Hake DF; Vukelich R; Kaplan SJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1973 May; 19(3):409-23. PubMed ID: 16811672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The measurement of sharing and cooperation as equity effects and some relationships between them.
    Hake DF; Vukelich R; Olvera D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1975 Jan; 23(1):63-79. PubMed ID: 16811833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of a coactor's focus of attention on task performance.
    Böckler A; Knoblich G; Sebanz N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Dec; 38(6):1404-15. PubMed ID: 22409143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Joint response-effect compatibility.
    Pfister R; Dolk T; Prinz W; Kunde W
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Jun; 21(3):817-22. PubMed ID: 24101572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interplay between action and movement intentions during social interaction.
    Ondobaka S; de Lange FP; Newman-Norlund RD; Wiemers M; Bekkering H
    Psychol Sci; 2012 Jan; 23(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 22157675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stimulus-dependent effects on tactile spatial acuity.
    Tannan V; Dennis RG; Tommerdahl M
    Behav Brain Funct; 2005 Oct; 1():18. PubMed ID: 16216121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of competitive reward distribution on auditing and competitive responding.
    Schmitt DR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2000 Jul; 74(1):115-25. PubMed ID: 10966099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Response selection during a joint action task.
    Ray M; Welsh TN
    J Mot Behav; 2011; 43(4):329-32. PubMed ID: 21774608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Conditioned suppression as a sensitive baseline for social facilitation.
    Hake DF; Powell J; Olsen R
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1969 Sep; 12(5):807-16. PubMed ID: 16811404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Unequal reinforcer magnitudes and relative preference for cooperation in the dyad.
    Shimoff E; Matthews BA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1975 Jul; 24(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 16811857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The focusing effect of self-evaluation threat in coaction and social comparison.
    Muller D; Butera F
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2007 Aug; 93(2):194-211. PubMed ID: 17645395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of the control exerted by a complex cooperation procedure.
    Hake DF; Vukelich R
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1973 Jan; 19(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 4706235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Switching from competition to sharing or cooperation at large response requirements: competition requires more responding.
    Hake DF; Olvera D; Bell JC
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1975 Nov; 24(3):343-54. PubMed ID: 16811886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Gender composition of pairs influences joint action effect.
    Fabbri M; Martoni M; Beracci A; Tonetti L; Natale V
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1122427. PubMed ID: 36910794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reinforcer frequency and restricted stimulus control.
    Dube WV; McIlvane WJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1997 Nov; 68(3):303-16. PubMed ID: 9375385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
    Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How two share a task: corepresenting stimulus-response mappings.
    Sebanz N; Knoblich G; Prinz W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Dec; 31(6):1234-46. PubMed ID: 16366786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the potential cost effectiveness of scientific audits.
    Click JL
    Account Res; 1989 Sep; 1(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 26859058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A risk-based approach to scheduling audits.
    Rönninger S; Holmes M
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2009; 63(6):575-88. PubMed ID: 20169864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.