These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16811864)

  • 1. Some variables affecting rate of key pecking during response-independent procedures (autoshaping).
    Perkins CC; Beavers WO; Hancock RA; Hemmendinger PC; Hemmendinger D; Ricci JA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1975 Jul; 24(1):59-72. PubMed ID: 16811864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rate and temporal pattern of key pecking under autoshaping and omission schedules of reinforcement.
    Deich JD; Wasserman EA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1977 Mar; 27(2):399-405. PubMed ID: 16812002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Associative interaction: joint control of key pecking by stimulus-reinforcer and response-reinforcer relationships.
    Woodruff G; Conner N; Gamzu E; Williams DR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1977 Sep; 28(2):133-44. PubMed ID: 16812020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Key pecking under response-independent food presentation after long simple and compound stimuli.
    Ricci JA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1973 May; 19(3):509-16. PubMed ID: 16811681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stimulus-food relations and free-operant postponement of timeout from response-independent food presentation.
    Galbicka G; Branch MN
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1983 Sep; 40(2):153-63. PubMed ID: 16812340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of reinforcement upon the prepecking behaviors of pigeons in the autoshaping experiment.
    Wessells MG
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1974 Jan; 21(1):125-44. PubMed ID: 16811726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interactions in multiple schedules: the role of the stimulus-reinforcer contingency.
    Spealman RD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1976 Jul; 26(1):79-93. PubMed ID: 16811933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of a response-reinforcer relation on elicited pecking.
    Steffen P; Liguori A; Marcucella H
    Behav Processes; 1990 Jun; 21(2-3):197-203. PubMed ID: 24925850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Autoshaping: further study of "negative automaintenance".
    Woodard WT; Ballinger JC; Bitterman ME
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1974 Jul; 22(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 16811786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mechanisms underlying the effects of unsignaled delayed reinforcement on key pecking of pigeons under variable-interval schedules.
    Schaal DW; Shahan TA; Kovera CA; Reilly MP
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1998 Mar; 69(2):103-22. PubMed ID: 9540229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Topographical variations in behavior during autoshaping, automaintenance, and omission training.
    Eldridge GD; Pear JJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1987 May; 47(3):319-33. PubMed ID: 16812484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Food-avoidance in hungry pigeons, and other perplexities.
    Herrnstein RJ; Loveland DH
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1972 Nov; 18(3):369-83. PubMed ID: 4661250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Autoshaping the pigeon's gape response: acquisition and topography as a function of reinforcer type and magnitude.
    Allan RW; Zeigler HP
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1994 Sep; 62(2):201-23. PubMed ID: 7964365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The maintenance of key pecking by stimulus-contingent and response-independent food presentation.
    Gamzu E; Schwartz B
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1973 Jan; 19(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 16811654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Acquisition and maintenance of autoshaped key pecking as a function of food stimulus and key stimulus similarity.
    Steinhauer GD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1982 Nov; 38(3):281-9. PubMed ID: 7175429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Punishment of observing by the negative discriminative stimulus.
    Mulvaney DE; Dinsmoor JA; Jwaideh AR; Hughes LH
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1974 Jan; 21(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 16811733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Economic and biological influences on key pecking and treadle pressing in pigeons.
    Green L; Holt DD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Jul; 80(1):43-58. PubMed ID: 13677608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Response factors in delay discounting: evidence for Pavlovian influences on delay discounting in pigeons.
    Holt DD; Carlson JD; Follett VL; Jerdee NJ; Kelley DP; Muhich KM; Tiry AM; Reetz NK
    Behav Processes; 2013 Sep; 98():37-43. PubMed ID: 23618788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Generalization peak shift for autoshaped and operant key pecks.
    Weiss SJ; Weissman RD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1992 Mar; 57(2):127-43. PubMed ID: 1573370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of the stimulus-reinforcer correlation in a discrete-trials IRT>t procedure.
    Wessells MG
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1979 May; 31(3):307-20. PubMed ID: 16812133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.