These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16811866)

  • 1. Freedom and knowledge: an experimental analysis of preference in pigeons.
    Catania AC
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1975 Jul; 24(1):89-106. PubMed ID: 16811866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preference for free choice over forced choice in pigeons.
    Catania AC; Sagvolden T
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1980 Jul; 34(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 16812181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Free-choice preference under uncertainty.
    Ono K
    Behav Processes; 2000 Mar; 49(1):11-19. PubMed ID: 10725649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rapid determinations of preference in multiple concurrent-chain schedules.
    Cerutti DT; Catania AC
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1986 Sep; 46(2):211-8. PubMed ID: 3760750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of primary reinforcement on pigeons' initial-link responding under a concurrent chains schedule with nondifferntial terminal links.
    Ploog BO
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 Jul; 76(1):75-94. PubMed ID: 11516116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pigeons' preference for free choice: number of keys versus key area.
    Cerutti D; Catania AC
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1997 Nov; 68(3):349-56. PubMed ID: 9375386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of terminal-link stimuli in concurrent-chain schedules: revisited using a behavioral-history procedure.
    Ono K; Yamagishi N; Aotsuka T; Hojo R; Nogawa Y
    Behav Processes; 2005 Aug; 70(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 15967283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Preference for mixed-interval versus fixed-interval schedules.
    Davison MC
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1969 Mar; 12(2):247-52. PubMed ID: 16811349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cued and uncued terminal links in concurrent-chains schedules.
    Alsop B; Stewart KE; Honig WK
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1994 Nov; 62(3):385-97. PubMed ID: 16812748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Preference for multiple versus mixed schedules of reinforcement.
    Alsop B; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1986 Jan; 45(1):33-45. PubMed ID: 16812442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Psychological distance to reward: equating the number of stimulus and response segments.
    Doughty AH; Meginley ME; Doughty SS; Lattal KA
    Behav Processes; 2004 May; 66(2):73-82. PubMed ID: 15110910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Some effects of procedural variations on choice responding in concurrent chains.
    Moore J
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2009 Nov; 92(3):345-65. PubMed ID: 20514166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Choice between two-component chained and tandem schedules.
    Schneider JW
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1972 Jul; 18(1):45-60. PubMed ID: 16811617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Resistance to change produced by access to fixed-delay versus variable-delay terminal links.
    Mellon RC; Shull RL
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1986 Jul; 46(1):79-92. PubMed ID: 16812455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Autoshaped responding: A baseline for studying stimulus preference.
    Catania AC; Owens MC; Von Lossberg V
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1983 Mar; 39(2):251-6. PubMed ID: 16812317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of experience on preference between forced and free choice.
    Ono K
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2004 Jan; 81(1):27-37. PubMed ID: 15113131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Choice and delay of reinforcement: Effects of terminal-link stimulus and response conditions.
    Omino T; Ito M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1993 Mar; 59(2):361-71. PubMed ID: 16812690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Choice for periodic schedules of reinforcement.
    Duncan B; Fantino E
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1970 Jul; 14(1):73-86. PubMed ID: 16811459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of rate of reinforcement and time in session on preference for variability.
    McSweeney FK; Kowal BP; Murphy ES
    Learn Behav; 2003 Aug; 31(3):225-41. PubMed ID: 14577547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Choice between concurrent schedules.
    Menlove RL; Moffitt M; Shimp CP
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1973 Mar; 19(2):331-44. PubMed ID: 16811668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.