These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Variations in the ability of general medical practitioners to apply two methods of clinical audit: A five-year study of assessment by peer review. McKay J; Bowie P; Lough M J Eval Clin Pract; 2006 Dec; 12(6):622-9. PubMed ID: 17100861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quality assessment and quality assurance in medical care. Sanazaro PJ Annu Rev Public Health; 1980; 1():37-68. PubMed ID: 6753865 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Better methods and improved competence is needed within the medical audit]. Bergström M; Calltorp J Lakartidningen; 1992 Dec; 89(50):4405-6. PubMed ID: 1469982 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. What are your goals for peer review? A framework for understanding differing methods. Fotenos A; Nagy P J Am Coll Radiol; 2012 Dec; 9(12):929-30. PubMed ID: 23206652 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Returning the queen of the professions to eminence--an enhancement of peer review. Sharp JR J Qual Assur; 1989; 11(2):4-9. PubMed ID: 10293006 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of a peer review process among interns at an Australian hospital. Mathews PW; Owen C; Ramsey W; Corrigan G; Bassett M; Wenzel J Aust Health Rev; 2010 Nov; 34(4):499-505. PubMed ID: 21108913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mini-PAT (Peer Assessment Tool): a well kept secret? Archer J J R Soc Med; 2008 Jun; 101(6):272. PubMed ID: 18515772 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Framework for feedback: the peer mini-clinical examination as a formative assessment tool. Bennett D; Kelly M; O'Flynn S Med Educ; 2012 May; 46(5):512. PubMed ID: 22515770 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Quality assessment and medical care evaluation. Organ PJ J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 1988 Jun; 78(6):320-7. PubMed ID: 3135385 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Practical principles of medical audit. Dixon N Postgrad Med J; 1990; 66 Suppl 3():S17-20; discussion S21. PubMed ID: 2247399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Revalidation. Pringle M Br J Gen Pract; 1999 Apr; 49(441):259-60. PubMed ID: 10736899 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Medical audit in the United States: a model for medical review in out country? Report of a study trip]. Casparie AF Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1977 Apr; 121(16):684-8. PubMed ID: 854113 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Fostering the critical attitude in medicine. McIntyre N Aust Clin Rev; 1985 Sep; 5(18):139-43. PubMed ID: 4091751 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Peer review. Part 2: The influence of internal and external standards on outcome. Tracey JM N Z Med J; 1991 Feb; 104(906):66-7. PubMed ID: 2020447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Much ado about nothing: critique of an endless audit of cholecystectomy. Fifer WR QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1978 Jun; 4(6):13-22. PubMed ID: 104240 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A critical analysis of mini peer assessment tool (mini-PAT). Abdulla A J R Soc Med; 2008 Jan; 101(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 18263910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Knowledge and competency in medicine. Nix JE J Miss State Med Assoc; 1990 Jul; 31(7):226-7. PubMed ID: 2196373 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The assessment of criterion audit cycles by external peer review - when is an audit not an audit? Bowie P; Cooke S; Lo P; McKay J; Lough M J Eval Clin Pract; 2007 Jun; 13(3):352-7. PubMed ID: 17518798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [The "Medical Peer Review" curriculum of the German Medical Association]. Chop I Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2012; 106(8):555-9. PubMed ID: 23084860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]