These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16811933)

  • 1. Interactions in multiple schedules: the role of the stimulus-reinforcer contingency.
    Spealman RD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1976 Jul; 26(1):79-93. PubMed ID: 16811933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Drug effects on responding maintained by stimulus-reinforcer and response-reinforcer contingencies.
    Spealman RD; Katz JL; Witkin JM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1978 Sep; 30(2):187-96. PubMed ID: 702026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stimulus-reinforcer contingencies and local behavioral contrast.
    Schwartz B
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1978 Mar; 29(2):297-308. PubMed ID: 16812057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mechanisms underlying the effects of unsignaled delayed reinforcement on key pecking of pigeons under variable-interval schedules.
    Schaal DW; Shahan TA; Kovera CA; Reilly MP
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1998 Mar; 69(2):103-22. PubMed ID: 9540229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Associative interaction: joint control of key pecking by stimulus-reinforcer and response-reinforcer relationships.
    Woodruff G; Conner N; Gamzu E; Williams DR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1977 Sep; 28(2):133-44. PubMed ID: 16812020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Observing responses in pigeons: effects of schedule component duration and schedule value.
    Branch MN
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1973 Nov; 20(3):417-28. PubMed ID: 16811715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The maintenance of key pecking by stimulus-contingent and response-independent food presentation.
    Gamzu E; Schwartz B
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1973 Jan; 19(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 16811654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Discrimination of response-reinforcer and response-stimulus contingencies in pigeons.
    Dodd PW
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1984 Jan; 41(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 6699541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Two different kinds of key peck in the pigeon: some properties of responses maintained by negative and positive response-reinforcer contingencies.
    Schwartz B; Williams DR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1972 Sep; 18(2):201-16. PubMed ID: 16811623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Behavioral contrast in the pigeon: a study of the duration of key pecking maintained on multiple schedules of reinforcement.
    Schwartz B; Hamilton B; Silberberg A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1975 Sep; 24(2):199-206. PubMed ID: 16811872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contrast and reallocation of extraneous reinforcers between multiple-schedule components.
    McLean AP
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1992 Nov; 58(3):497-511. PubMed ID: 16812677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Concurrent performances: synthesizing rate constancies by manipulating contingencies for a single response.
    Catania AC
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1972 Mar; 17(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 16811575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Second-order schedules: a comparison of chained, brief-stimulus, and tandem procedures.
    Malagodi EF; Deweese J; Johnston JM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1973 Nov; 20(3):447-60. PubMed ID: 16811717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of a response-reinforcer relation on elicited pecking.
    Steffen P; Liguori A; Marcucella H
    Behav Processes; 1990 Jun; 21(2-3):197-203. PubMed ID: 24925850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of search cost on foraging and feeding: a three-component chain analysis.
    Peden BF; Rohe MS
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1984 Sep; 42(2):211-21. PubMed ID: 6502067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of response rate, reinforcement frequency, and the duration of a stimulus preceding response-independent food.
    Smith JB
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1974 Mar; 21(2):215-21. PubMed ID: 16811739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multiple schedules, off-baseline reinforcement shifts, and resistance to extinction.
    Craig AR; Shahan TA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2018 Jan; 109(1):148-163. PubMed ID: 29293265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Some variables affecting rate of key pecking during response-independent procedures (autoshaping).
    Perkins CC; Beavers WO; Hancock RA; Hemmendinger PC; Hemmendinger D; Ricci JA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1975 Jul; 24(1):59-72. PubMed ID: 16811864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Auto-maintenance in the pigeon: sustained pecking despite contingent non-reinforcement.
    Williams DR; Williams H
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1969 Jul; 12(4):511-20. PubMed ID: 16811370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Key pecking under response-independent food presentation after long simple and compound stimuli.
    Ricci JA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1973 May; 19(3):509-16. PubMed ID: 16811681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.