These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16812077)

  • 1. Beyond the relational principle of reinforcement.
    Allison J
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1978 May; 29(3):557-60. PubMed ID: 16812077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Response deprivation, reinforcement, and economics.
    Allison J
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1993 Jul; 60(1):129-140. PubMed ID: 16812695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Positive conditioned suppression: Transfer of performance between contingent and noncontingent reinforcement situations.
    Davison M; Sheldon L; Lobb B
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1980 Jan; 33(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 16812161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. From contrast to reinforcement: role of response contingency in anticipatory contrast.
    Flaherty CF; Grigson PS
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1988 Apr; 14(2):165-76. PubMed ID: 3367102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reinforcer specificity of the suppression of instrumental performance on a non-contingent schedule.
    Dickinson A; Mulatero CW
    Behav Processes; 1989 Jun; 19(1-3):167-80. PubMed ID: 24895910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reinforcement of schedule-induced drinking in rats by lick-contingent shortening of food delivery.
    Álvarez B; Íbias J; Pellón R
    Learn Behav; 2016 Dec; 44(4):329-339. PubMed ID: 27059234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relative influences of establishing operations and reinforcement contingencies on self-injurious behavior during functional analyses.
    Worsdell AS; Iwata BA; Conners J; Kahng SW; Thompson RH
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(4):451-61. PubMed ID: 11214022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does contingent reinforcement strengthen operant behavior?
    Nevin JA; Smith LD; Roberts J
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1987 Jul; 48(1):17-33. PubMed ID: 16812487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Toward a nonhuman model of contingency management: effects of reinforcing abstinence from nicotine self-administration in rats with an alternative nondrug reinforcer.
    Lesage MG
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2009 Mar; 203(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 18946663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Aversive aspects of a schedule of positive reinforcement.
    APPEL JB
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1963 Jul; 6(3):423-8. PubMed ID: 14013456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of a freely available response on the schedule performance of mentally retarded persons.
    Diorio MS; Konarski EA
    Am J Ment Retard; 1989 Jan; 93(4):373-9. PubMed ID: 2930654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Response acquisition under targeted percentile schedules: a continuing quandary for molar models of operant behavior.
    Galbicka G; Kautz MA; Jagers T
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1993 Jul; 60(1):171-84. PubMed ID: 8354966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Precurrent contingencies: Behavior reinforced by altering reinforcement probability for other behavior.
    Polson DA; Parsons JA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1994 May; 61(3):427-39. PubMed ID: 16812731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reinforcement loss and behavioral tolerance to d-amphetamine: using percentile schedules to control reinforcement density.
    Galbicka G; Kautz MA; Ritch ZJ
    Behav Pharmacol; 1992 Dec; 3(6):535-544. PubMed ID: 11224155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Control over response number by a targeted percentile schedule: reinforcement loss and the acute effects of d-amphetamine.
    Galbicka G; Fowler KP; Ritch ZJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Sep; 56(2):205-15. PubMed ID: 1955813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of contingency upon the appetitive conditioning of free-operant behavior.
    Hammond LJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1980 Nov; 34(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 16812191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of response deprivation on the instrumental performance of mentally retarded persons.
    Konarski EA
    Am J Ment Defic; 1987 Mar; 91(5):537-42. PubMed ID: 3565497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Disruption of responding maintained by conditioned reinforcement: alterations in response-conditioned-reinforcer relations.
    Lieving GA; Reilly MP; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2006 Sep; 86(2):197-209. PubMed ID: 17002227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How should periods without social interaction be scheduled? Children's preference for practical schedules of positive reinforcement.
    Luczynski KC; Hanley GP
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2014; 47(3):500-22. PubMed ID: 24890928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acquisition of a spatially defined operant with delayed reinforcement.
    Critchfield TS; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1993 Mar; 59(2):373-87. PubMed ID: 8454959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.