These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16812105)

  • 21. Contingent payment procedures for smoking reduction and cessation.
    Stitzer ML; Rand CS; Bigelow GE; Mead AM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1986; 19(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 3733589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Some temporal parameters of non-contingent reinforcement.
    Lachter GD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1971 Sep; 16(2):207-17. PubMed ID: 16811542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Some effects of correlation between response-contingent shock and reinforcement.
    Murray M; Nevin JA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1967 May; 10(3):301-9. PubMed ID: 6056803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of medial septal lesions on action-outcome associations in rats under conditions of delayed reinforcement.
    Numan R; Ouimette AS; Holloway KA; Curry CE
    Behav Neurosci; 2004 Dec; 118(6):1240-52. PubMed ID: 15598133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Explicit knowledge of stimulus-outcome contingencies and stimulus control of selective attention and instrumental action in human smoking behaviour.
    Hogarth L; Dickinson A; Duka T
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2005 Feb; 177(4):428-37. PubMed ID: 15300356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effects of response cost and response restriction on a multiple-response repertoire with humans.
    Crosbie J
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1993 Jan; 59(1):173-92. PubMed ID: 16812683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Superior-subordinate dyads: Dependence of leader effectiveness on mutual reinforcement contingencies.
    Rao RK; Mawhinney TC
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Jul; 56(1):105-18. PubMed ID: 16812640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of alternative responses on behavior exposed to noncontingent reinforcement.
    Virues-Ortega J; Iwata BA; Fahmie TA; Harper JM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2013; 46(3):603-12. PubMed ID: 24114223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Drug discrimination under two concurrent fixed-interval fixed-interval schedules.
    McMillan DE; Li M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2000 Jul; 74(1):55-77. PubMed ID: 10966096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Some contextual and historical determinants of the effects of chlordiazepoxide on punished responding of rats.
    Witkin JM
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2002 Oct; 163(3-4):488-94. PubMed ID: 12373449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of alcohol on variability-contingent reinforcement in human subjects.
    McKinley PJ; Quevedo-Converse YG; Crow LT
    Psychol Rep; 1989 Apr; 64(2):391-6. PubMed ID: 2710881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Contingent reinforcement for carbon monoxide reduction: within-subject effects of pay amount.
    Stitzer ML; Bigelow GE
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1984; 17(4):477-83. PubMed ID: 6526768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The role of contingencies and "principles of behavioral variation" in pigeons' pecking.
    Fenner D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1980 Jul; 34(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 16812174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Self-administered and noncontingent nicotine enhance reinforced operant responding in rats: impact of nicotine dose and reinforcement schedule.
    Chaudhri N; Caggiula AR; Donny EC; Booth S; Gharib M; Craven L; Palmatier MI; Liu X; Sved AF
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2007 Feb; 190(3):353-62. PubMed ID: 16847680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Intermittent punishment of human responding maintained by intermittent reinforcement.
    Scobie SR; Kaufman A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1969 Jan; 12(1):137-47. PubMed ID: 16811334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Response additivity: effects of superimposed free reinforcement on a variable-interval baseline.
    Boakes RA; Halliday MS; Poli M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1975 Mar; 23(2):177-91. PubMed ID: 16811838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A time course analysis of satiety-induced instrumental outcome devaluation.
    Parkes SL; Marchand AR; Ferreira G; Coutureau E
    Learn Behav; 2016 Dec; 44(4):347-355. PubMed ID: 27129787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Differences in the effect of Pavlovian contingencies upon behavioral momentum using auditory versus visual stimuli.
    Mauro BC; Mace FC
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1996 Mar; 65(2):389-99. PubMed ID: 8851539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Response acquisition under targeted percentile schedules: a continuing quandary for molar models of operant behavior.
    Galbicka G; Kautz MA; Jagers T
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1993 Jul; 60(1):171-84. PubMed ID: 8354966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Human instrumental performance in ratio and interval contingencies: A challenge for associative theory.
    Pérez OD; Aitken MR; Zhukovsky P; Soto FA; Urcelay GP; Dickinson A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Feb; 72(2):311-321. PubMed ID: 27894212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.