These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16812140)

  • 1. Automaintenance without stimulus-change reinforcement: Temporal control of key pecks.
    Myerson J; Myerson WA; Parker BK
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1979 May; 31(3):395-403. PubMed ID: 16812140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. "Automaintenance": the role of reinforcement.
    Hursh SR; Navarick DJ; Fantino E
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1974 Jan; 21(1):117-24. PubMed ID: 16811725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Topographical variations in behavior during autoshaping, automaintenance, and omission training.
    Eldridge GD; Pear JJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1987 May; 47(3):319-33. PubMed ID: 16812484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Key pecking in pigeons produced by pairing keylight with inaccessible grain.
    Zentall TR; Hogan DE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1975 Mar; 23(2):199-206. PubMed ID: 16811840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mechanisms underlying the effects of unsignaled delayed reinforcement on key pecking of pigeons under variable-interval schedules.
    Schaal DW; Shahan TA; Kovera CA; Reilly MP
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1998 Mar; 69(2):103-22. PubMed ID: 9540229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Discriminated interresponse times: role of autoshaped responses.
    Palmer DC; Donahoe JW; Crowley MA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1985 Nov; 44(3):301-13. PubMed ID: 4086973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Autoshaped key pecking maintained by access to a social space.
    Peele DB; Ferster CB
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1982 Sep; 38(2):181-9. PubMed ID: 7130895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Generalization peak shift for autoshaped and operant key pecks.
    Weiss SJ; Weissman RD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1992 Mar; 57(2):127-43. PubMed ID: 1573370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Second-order autoshaped key pecking based on an auditory stimulus.
    Burt JS; Westbrook RF
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1980 Nov; 34(3):305-18. PubMed ID: 7452133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acquisition and maintenance of autoshaped key pecking as a function of food stimulus and key stimulus similarity.
    Steinhauer GD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1982 Nov; 38(3):281-9. PubMed ID: 7175429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Key pecking under response-independent food presentation after long simple and compound stimuli.
    Ricci JA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1973 May; 19(3):509-16. PubMed ID: 16811681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of modifying consummatory behavior on the topography of the autoshaped pecking response in pigeons.
    Premock M; Klipec WD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1981 Sep; 36(2):277-84. PubMed ID: 16812246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of reinforcement upon the prepecking behaviors of pigeons in the autoshaping experiment.
    Wessells MG
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1974 Jan; 21(1):125-44. PubMed ID: 16811726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stimulus-food relations and free-operant postponement of timeout from response-independent food presentation.
    Galbicka G; Branch MN
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1983 Sep; 40(2):153-63. PubMed ID: 16812340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Autoshaping: further study of "negative automaintenance".
    Woodard WT; Ballinger JC; Bitterman ME
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1974 Jul; 22(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 16811786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Graded differential reinforcement: Response-dependent reinforcer amount.
    Gentry GD; Eskew RT
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1984 Jan; 41(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 16812356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Autoshaping the pigeon's gape response: acquisition and topography as a function of reinforcer type and magnitude.
    Allan RW; Zeigler HP
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1994 Sep; 62(2):201-23. PubMed ID: 7964365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of the stimulus-reinforcer correlation in a discrete-trials IRT>t procedure.
    Wessells MG
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1979 May; 31(3):307-20. PubMed ID: 16812133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Key pecking of pigeons under variable-interval schedules of briefly signaled delayed reinforcement: effects of variable-interval value.
    Schaal DW; Schuh KJ; Branch MN
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1992 Sep; 58(2):277-86. PubMed ID: 1402602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of the response-reinforcer contingency in negative automaintenance.
    Schwartz B; Williams DR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1972 May; 17(3):351-7. PubMed ID: 16811590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.