These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16812146)

  • 1. Effects of response-independent negative reinforcers on negatively reinforced key pecking.
    Hutton L; Lewis P
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1979 Jul; 32(1):93-100. PubMed ID: 16812146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Parameters affecting the maintenance of negatively reinforced key pecking.
    Gardner ET; Lewis P
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1977 Sep; 28(2):117-31. PubMed ID: 16812019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Economic and biological influences on a pigeon's key peck.
    Green L; Rachlin H
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1975 Jan; 23(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 16811832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Two different kinds of key peck in the pigeon: some properties of responses maintained by negative and positive response-reinforcer contingencies.
    Schwartz B; Williams DR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1972 Sep; 18(2):201-16. PubMed ID: 16811623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On some determinants of choice in pigeons.
    REYNOLDS GS
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1963 Jan; 6(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 13986426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contrast and reallocation of extraneous reinforcers between multiple-schedule components.
    McLean AP
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1992 Nov; 58(3):497-511. PubMed ID: 16812677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stimulus control of respondent and operant key pecking: A single key procedure.
    Marcucella H
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1981 Jul; 36(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 16812231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Autoshaping the pigeon's gape response: acquisition and topography as a function of reinforcer type and magnitude.
    Allan RW; Zeigler HP
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1994 Sep; 62(2):201-23. PubMed ID: 7964365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of alternative reinforcement: does the source matter?
    Rachlin H; Baum WM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1972 Sep; 18(2):231-41. PubMed ID: 16811627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Alternative reinforcement effects on fixed-interval performance.
    Lattal KA; Boyer SS
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1980 Nov; 34(3):285-96. PubMed ID: 16812190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mechanisms underlying the effects of unsignaled delayed reinforcement on key pecking of pigeons under variable-interval schedules.
    Schaal DW; Shahan TA; Kovera CA; Reilly MP
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1998 Mar; 69(2):103-22. PubMed ID: 9540229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transfer of control of the pigeon's key peck from food reinforcement to avoidance of shock.
    Foree DD; Lolordo VM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1974 Sep; 22(2):251-9. PubMed ID: 16811792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Generalization peak shift for autoshaped and operant key pecks.
    Weiss SJ; Weissman RD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1992 Mar; 57(2):127-43. PubMed ID: 1573370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A quantitative analysis of the behavior maintained by delayed reinforcers.
    Catania AC; Reilly MP; Hand D; Kehle LK; Valentine L; Shimoff E
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Mar; 103(2):288-31. PubMed ID: 25927102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Secondary reinforcement and number of primary reinforcements.
    Fantino E; Herrnstein RJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1968 Jan; 11(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 5636860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Alternative reinforcement increases resistance to change: Pavlovian or operant contingencies?
    Nevin JA; Tota ME; Torquato RD; Shull RL
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1990 May; 53(3):359-79. PubMed ID: 2341820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Responses eliminated by noncontingent or negatively contingent reinforcement recover in extinction.
    Lindblom LL; Jenkins HM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1981 Apr; 7(2):175-90. PubMed ID: 7241053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Discrimination of compound stimuli involving the presence or absence of a distinctive visual feature.
    Farthing GW
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1971 Nov; 16(3):327-36. PubMed ID: 5150043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Behavioral momentum and accumulation of mass in multiple schedules.
    Craig AR; Cunningham PJ; Shahan TA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 May; 103(3):437-49. PubMed ID: 25787824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of unsignalled delayed reinforcement.
    Williams BA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1976 Nov; 26(3):441-9. PubMed ID: 16811959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.