These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16812191)

  • 1. The effect of contingency upon the appetitive conditioning of free-operant behavior.
    Hammond LJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1980 Nov; 34(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 16812191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Varied effects of conventional antiepileptics on responding maintained by negative versus positive reinforcement.
    Roberts C; Harvey MT; May ME; Valdovinos MG; Patterson TG; Couppis MH; Kennedy CH
    Physiol Behav; 2008 Feb; 93(3):612-21. PubMed ID: 18061218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inactivation of dorsolateral striatum enhances sensitivity to changes in the action-outcome contingency in instrumental conditioning.
    Yin HH; Knowlton BJ; Balleine BW
    Behav Brain Res; 2006 Jan; 166(2):189-96. PubMed ID: 16153716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of medial septal lesions on action-outcome associations in rats under conditions of delayed reinforcement.
    Numan R; Ouimette AS; Holloway KA; Curry CE
    Behav Neurosci; 2004 Dec; 118(6):1240-52. PubMed ID: 15598133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Alternative reinforcement increases resistance to change: Pavlovian or operant contingencies?
    Nevin JA; Tota ME; Torquato RD; Shull RL
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1990 May; 53(3):359-79. PubMed ID: 2341820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A reinforcement learning approach to instrumental contingency degradation in rats.
    Dutech A; Coutureau E; Marchand AR
    J Physiol Paris; 2011; 105(1-3):36-44. PubMed ID: 21907801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Response acquisition under targeted percentile schedules: a continuing quandary for molar models of operant behavior.
    Galbicka G; Kautz MA; Jagers T
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1993 Jul; 60(1):171-84. PubMed ID: 8354966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Acquisition of operant behavior in rats with delayed reinforcement: A retractable-lever procedure.
    McNamara AA; Johnson LE; Tate C; Chiang T; Byrne T
    Behav Processes; 2015 Feb; 111():37-41. PubMed ID: 25464338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Negative reinforcement of behavioral variability without previous training with positive reinforcement.
    Fonseca-Júnior AR; Hunziker MHL
    Behav Processes; 2023 Jan; 204():104797. PubMed ID: 36460137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automatic reinforcement from operant wheel-running undermines temporal control by fixed-interval schedules of reinforcement.
    Belke TW; Pierce WD; Welsh TM
    Behav Processes; 2018 Dec; 157():91-101. PubMed ID: 30219288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of analysis methods to estimate contingency strength.
    Lloyd BP; Staubitz JL; Tapp JT
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2018 Jul; 51(3):738-753. PubMed ID: 29744865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Precurrent contingencies: Behavior reinforced by altering reinforcement probability for other behavior.
    Polson DA; Parsons JA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1994 May; 61(3):427-39. PubMed ID: 16812731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of sensitization on the detection of an instrumental contingency.
    Phillips GD; Vugler A
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2011 Nov; 100(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 21820464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Competition between stimulus-reinforcer contingencies and anticipatory contrast.
    Williams BA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1992 Sep; 58(2):287-302. PubMed ID: 1402603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evidence for positive, but not negative, behavioral contrast with wheel-running reinforcement on multiple variable-ratio schedules.
    Belke TW; Pierce WD
    Behav Processes; 2016 Dec; 133():37-43. PubMed ID: 27826007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Parametric manipulation of interresponse-time contingency independent of reinforcement rate.
    Galbicka G; Platt JR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1986 Oct; 12(4):371-80. PubMed ID: 3772301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contingency, contiguity, and causality in conditioning: Applying information theory and Weber's Law to the assignment of credit problem.
    Gallistel CR; Craig AR; Shahan TA
    Psychol Rev; 2019 Oct; 126(5):761-773. PubMed ID: 31464474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Instrumental uncertainty as a determinant of behavior under interval schedules of reinforcement.
    Derusso AL; Fan D; Gupta J; Shelest O; Costa RM; Yin HH
    Front Integr Neurosci; 2010; 4():. PubMed ID: 20725502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Acquisition of a lever press behavior by mice in a water reinforcement situation].
    Kaneto H; Nanri M
    Yakubutsu Seishin Kodo; 1984 Nov; 4(3):213-20. PubMed ID: 6534036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Superior-subordinate dyads: Dependence of leader effectiveness on mutual reinforcement contingencies.
    Rao RK; Mawhinney TC
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Jul; 56(1):105-18. PubMed ID: 16812640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.