These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Fixed-ratio performance with and without a postreinforcement timeout. Mazur JE; Hyslop ME J Exp Anal Behav; 1982 Sep; 38(2):143-55. PubMed ID: 16812293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sequential patterns in post-reinforcement pauses on fixed-interval schedules of food. Shull RL J Exp Anal Behav; 1971 Mar; 15(2):221-31. PubMed ID: 16811505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interresponse time changes as a function of water deprivation and amphetamine. Brown BM; Seiden LS J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 1975 May; 193(2):701-12. PubMed ID: 1142113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of drugs on response duration differentiation. VI: differential effects under differential reinforcement of low rates of responding schedules. McClure GY; McMillan DE J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 1997 Jun; 281(3):1368-80. PubMed ID: 9190873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The role of verbal behavior in human learning: infant performance on fixed-interval schedules. Lowe CF; Beasty A; Bentall RP J Exp Anal Behav; 1983 Jan; 39(1):157-64. PubMed ID: 6833937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Aggression as positive reinforcement in mice under various ratio- and time-based reinforcement schedules. May ME; Kennedy CH J Exp Anal Behav; 2009 Mar; 91(2):185-96. PubMed ID: 19794833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Changing the response unit from a single peck to a fixed number of pecks in fixed-interval schedules. Shull RL; Guilkey M; Witty W J Exp Anal Behav; 1972 Mar; 17(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 16811581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantifying the molecular structure of behavior: separate effects of caffeine, cocaine, and adenosine agonists on interresponse times and lever-press durations. Newland MC Behav Pharmacol; 1997 Feb; 8(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 9832996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Alternative reinforcement effects on fixed-interval performance. Lattal KA; Boyer SS J Exp Anal Behav; 1980 Nov; 34(3):285-96. PubMed ID: 16812190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of a delay-reinforcement procedure on performance under IRT>t schedules. Gonzalez FA; Newlin RJ J Exp Anal Behav; 1976 Sep; 26(2):221-35. PubMed ID: 16811944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Constraints on the process of interresponse-time reinforcement as the explanation of variable-interval performance. Wearden JH; Clark RB Behav Processes; 1989 Dec; 20(1-3):151-75. PubMed ID: 24925789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of ratio and interval reinforcement schedules with comparable interreinforcement times. Capehart GW; Eckerman DA; Guilkey M; Shull RL J Exp Anal Behav; 1980 Jul; 34(1):61-76. PubMed ID: 16812180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Studies on responding under fixed-interval schedules of reinforcement: the effects on the pattern of responding of changes in requirements at reinforcement. Dews PB J Exp Anal Behav; 1969 Mar; 12(2):191-9. PubMed ID: 16811344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of reinforcement in controlling sequential IRT dependencies. Angle HV J Exp Anal Behav; 1970 Sep; 14(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 16811464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]