These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16812340)

  • 1. Stimulus-food relations and free-operant postponement of timeout from response-independent food presentation.
    Galbicka G; Branch MN
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1983 Sep; 40(2):153-63. PubMed ID: 16812340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Timeout postponement without increased reinforcement frequency.
    Pietras CJ; Hackenberg TD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2000 Sep; 74(2):147-64. PubMed ID: 11029020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Discriminated timeout avoidance in pigeons: the roles of added stimuli.
    DeFulio A; Hackenberg TD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2007 Jul; 88(1):51-71. PubMed ID: 17725051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mirror pecking and timeout under a multiple fixed-ratio schedule of food delivery.
    Ator NA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1980 Nov; 34(3):319-28. PubMed ID: 16812192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reinforcer magnitude attenuates: apomorphine's effects on operant pecking.
    Pinkston JW; Lamb RJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2012 Nov; 98(3):273-82. PubMed ID: 23144505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mechanisms underlying the effects of unsignaled delayed reinforcement on key pecking of pigeons under variable-interval schedules.
    Schaal DW; Shahan TA; Kovera CA; Reilly MP
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1998 Mar; 69(2):103-22. PubMed ID: 9540229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automaintenance without stimulus-change reinforcement: Temporal control of key pecks.
    Myerson J; Myerson WA; Parker BK
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1979 May; 31(3):395-403. PubMed ID: 16812140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Some variables affecting rate of key pecking during response-independent procedures (autoshaping).
    Perkins CC; Beavers WO; Hancock RA; Hemmendinger PC; Hemmendinger D; Ricci JA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1975 Jul; 24(1):59-72. PubMed ID: 16811864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Generalization peak shift for autoshaped and operant key pecks.
    Weiss SJ; Weissman RD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1992 Mar; 57(2):127-43. PubMed ID: 1573370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Response-produced timeouts under a progressive-ratio schedule with a punished reset option.
    Dardano JF
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1974 Jul; 22(1):103-13. PubMed ID: 16811767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Avoidance of timeout from response-independent reinforcement.
    D'Andrea T
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1971 May; 15(3):319-25. PubMed ID: 16811518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Variable-interval schedules of timeout from avoidance.
    Perone M; Galizio M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1987 Jan; 47(1):97-113. PubMed ID: 16812473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Key pecking under response-independent food presentation after long simple and compound stimuli.
    Ricci JA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1973 May; 19(3):509-16. PubMed ID: 16811681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Conjoint schedules of timeout deletion in pigeons.
    Hackenberg TD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1992 Sep; 58(2):349-60. PubMed ID: 1402605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Discrimination of response-reinforcer and response-stimulus contingencies in pigeons.
    Dodd PW
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1984 Jan; 41(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 6699541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The aversiveness of timeout from response-dependent and response-independent food deliveries as a function of delivery rate.
    Toegel C; Holtyn AF; Toegel F; Perone M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2022 Mar; 117(2):201-239. PubMed ID: 35141888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cocaine's effects on food-reinforced pecking in pigeons depend on food-deprivation level.
    Schaal DW; Miller MA; Odum AL
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1995 Jul; 64(1):61-73. PubMed ID: 7622982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Punishment-specific effects of pentobarbital: dependency on the type of punisher.
    Branch MN; Nicholson G; Dworkin SI
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1977 Nov; 28(3):285-93. PubMed ID: 562919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interactions in multiple schedules: the role of the stimulus-reinforcer contingency.
    Spealman RD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1976 Jul; 26(1):79-93. PubMed ID: 16811933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Control of responding by stimulus duration.
    Elsmore TF
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1971 Jul; 16(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 16811537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.