These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
15. Discrimination of response-reinforcer and response-stimulus contingencies in pigeons. Dodd PW J Exp Anal Behav; 1984 Jan; 41(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 6699541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The aversiveness of timeout from response-dependent and response-independent food deliveries as a function of delivery rate. Toegel C; Holtyn AF; Toegel F; Perone M J Exp Anal Behav; 2022 Mar; 117(2):201-239. PubMed ID: 35141888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cocaine's effects on food-reinforced pecking in pigeons depend on food-deprivation level. Schaal DW; Miller MA; Odum AL J Exp Anal Behav; 1995 Jul; 64(1):61-73. PubMed ID: 7622982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Punishment-specific effects of pentobarbital: dependency on the type of punisher. Branch MN; Nicholson G; Dworkin SI J Exp Anal Behav; 1977 Nov; 28(3):285-93. PubMed ID: 562919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interactions in multiple schedules: the role of the stimulus-reinforcer contingency. Spealman RD J Exp Anal Behav; 1976 Jul; 26(1):79-93. PubMed ID: 16811933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Control of responding by stimulus duration. Elsmore TF J Exp Anal Behav; 1971 Jul; 16(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 16811537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]