These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16812356)

  • 1. Graded differential reinforcement: Response-dependent reinforcer amount.
    Gentry GD; Eskew RT
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1984 Jan; 41(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 16812356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of the response-reinforcer contingency in negative automaintenance.
    Schwartz B; Williams DR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1972 May; 17(3):351-7. PubMed ID: 16811590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automaintenance without stimulus-change reinforcement: Temporal control of key pecks.
    Myerson J; Myerson WA; Parker BK
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1979 May; 31(3):395-403. PubMed ID: 16812140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. "Automaintenance": the role of reinforcement.
    Hursh SR; Navarick DJ; Fantino E
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1974 Jan; 21(1):117-24. PubMed ID: 16811725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Two different kinds of key peck in the pigeon: some properties of responses maintained by negative and positive response-reinforcer contingencies.
    Schwartz B; Williams DR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1972 Sep; 18(2):201-16. PubMed ID: 16811623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Response-reinforcer relations and the maintenance of behavior.
    Gleeson S; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1987 Nov; 48(3):383-93. PubMed ID: 16812499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acquisition and maintenance of autoshaped key pecking as a function of food stimulus and key stimulus similarity.
    Steinhauer GD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1982 Nov; 38(3):281-9. PubMed ID: 7175429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reinforcement loss and behavioral tolerance to d-amphetamine: using percentile schedules to control reinforcement density.
    Galbicka G; Kautz MA; Ritch ZJ
    Behav Pharmacol; 1992 Dec; 3(6):535-544. PubMed ID: 11224155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Response rate as a function of amount of reinforcement for a signalled concurrent response.
    Rachlin H; Baum WM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1969 Jan; 12(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 16811331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Discrimination and differentiation of response number in stimulus directed pecking of pigeons.
    Dodd PW
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1980 Mar; 33(2):253-64. PubMed ID: 7365408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of reinforcer magnitude on responding under differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate schedules of rats and pigeons.
    Doughty AH; Richards JB
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 Jul; 78(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 12144310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inter-response-time reinforcement and relative reinforcer frequency control choice.
    Tanno T; Silberberg A
    Learn Behav; 2015 Mar; 43(1):54-71. PubMed ID: 25515591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of varying the duration of grain presentation on automaintenance.
    Balsam PD; Brownstein AJ; Shull RL
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1978 Jan; 29(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 16812036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Autoshaping: further study of "negative automaintenance".
    Woodard WT; Ballinger JC; Bitterman ME
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1974 Jul; 22(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 16811786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Discriminated interresponse times: role of autoshaped responses.
    Palmer DC; Donahoe JW; Crowley MA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1985 Nov; 44(3):301-13. PubMed ID: 4086973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Some effects of response-correlated increases in reinforcer magnitude on human behavior.
    Buskist W; Oliveira-Castro J; Bennett R
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1988 Jan; 49(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 16812534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Delayed reinforcement of fixed-ratio performance without mediating exteroceptive conditioned reinforcement.
    Kendall SB; Newby W
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1978 Sep; 30(2):231-7. PubMed ID: 16812103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of the stimulus-reinforcer correlation in a discrete-trials IRT>t procedure.
    Wessells MG
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1979 May; 31(3):307-20. PubMed ID: 16812133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of unsignalled delayed reinforcement.
    Williams BA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1976 Nov; 26(3):441-9. PubMed ID: 16811959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mechanisms underlying the effects of unsignaled delayed reinforcement on key pecking of pigeons under variable-interval schedules.
    Schaal DW; Shahan TA; Kovera CA; Reilly MP
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1998 Mar; 69(2):103-22. PubMed ID: 9540229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.