These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16812392)

  • 1. Choice and transformed interreinforcement intervals.
    Moore J
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1984 Sep; 42(2):321-35. PubMed ID: 16812392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preference for unsegmented interreinforcement intervals in concurrent chains.
    Leung JP; Winton AS
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1985 Jul; 44(1):89-101. PubMed ID: 16812428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the measurement of reinforcement frequency in the study of preference.
    Killeen P
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1968 May; 11(3):263-9. PubMed ID: 5660707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Some effects of interreinforcement time upon choice.
    Fantino E; Duncan B
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1972 Jan; 17(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 16811564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The psychological distance to reward.
    Duncan B; Fantino E
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1972 Jul; 18(1):23-34. PubMed ID: 16811615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preference for simple interval schedules of reinforcement in concurrent chains: Effects of segmentation ratio.
    Leung JP; Winton AS
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1988 Jan; 49(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 16812535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A model for choice in simple concurrent and concurrent-chains schedules.
    Squires N; Fantino E
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1971 Jan; 15(1):27-38. PubMed ID: 16811486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Choice and response contingencies.
    Moore J; Fantino E
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1975 May; 23(3):339-47. PubMed ID: 16811849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Choice between two-component chained and tandem schedules.
    Schneider JW
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1972 Jul; 18(1):45-60. PubMed ID: 16811617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Choice and segmented interreinforcement intervals.
    Moore J
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1982 Sep; 38(2):133-41. PubMed ID: 16812292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Resistance to change produced by access to fixed-delay versus variable-delay terminal links.
    Mellon RC; Shull RL
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1986 Jul; 46(1):79-92. PubMed ID: 16812455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing preference and resistance to change in constant- and variable-duration schedule components.
    Grace RC; Nevin JA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2000 Sep; 74(2):165-88. PubMed ID: 11029021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Local response-rate constancy on concurrent variable-interval schedules of reinforcement.
    Pliskoff SS; Cicerone R; Nelson TD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1978 May; 29(3):431-46. PubMed ID: 16812067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Choice for periodic schedules of reinforcement.
    Duncan B; Fantino E
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1970 Jul; 14(1):73-86. PubMed ID: 16811459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does sensitivity to magnitude depend on the temporal distribution of reinforcement?
    Grace RC; Bragason O
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 Mar; 83(2):169-84. PubMed ID: 15828593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transitivity as a property of choice.
    Navarick DJ; Fantino E
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1972 Nov; 18(3):389-401. PubMed ID: 16811633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Response strength in multiple periodic and aperiodic schedules.
    Mandell C
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1980 Mar; 33(2):221-41. PubMed ID: 16812166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Choices between segmented and unsegmented schedules and the self-control paradigm.
    Alessandri J; Lattal KA; Fantino E
    Behav Processes; 2013 Mar; 94():26-31. PubMed ID: 23206903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preference for multiple versus mixed schedules of reinforcement.
    Alsop B; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1986 Jan; 45(1):33-45. PubMed ID: 16812442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preference for less segmented fixed-time components in concurrent-chain schedules of reinforcement.
    Leung JP; Winton AS
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1986 Sep; 46(2):175-83. PubMed ID: 16812458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.