These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16812501)
1. A role for negative reinforcement of response omission in punishment? Arbuckle JL; Lattal KA J Exp Anal Behav; 1987 Nov; 48(3):407-16. PubMed ID: 16812501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Punishment-specific effects of pentobarbital: dependency on the type of punisher. Branch MN; Nicholson G; Dworkin SI J Exp Anal Behav; 1977 Nov; 28(3):285-93. PubMed ID: 562919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Response-cost punishment via token loss with pigeons. Pietras CJ; Hackenberg TD Behav Processes; 2005 Jun; 69(3):343-56. PubMed ID: 15896532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of punishment shock intensity upon responding under multiple schedules. Powell RW J Exp Anal Behav; 1970 Sep; 14(2):201-11. PubMed ID: 16811468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intermittent punishment of human responding maintained by intermittent reinforcement. Scobie SR; Kaufman A J Exp Anal Behav; 1969 Jan; 12(1):137-47. PubMed ID: 16811334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of alternative reinforcement sources: A reevaluation. Imam AA; Lattal KA J Exp Anal Behav; 1988 Sep; 50(2):261-71. PubMed ID: 16812558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mechanisms underlying the effects of unsignaled delayed reinforcement on key pecking of pigeons under variable-interval schedules. Schaal DW; Shahan TA; Kovera CA; Reilly MP J Exp Anal Behav; 1998 Mar; 69(2):103-22. PubMed ID: 9540229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interaction of methadone, reinforcement history, and variable-interval performance. Nader MA; Thompson T J Exp Anal Behav; 1987 Sep; 48(2):303-15. PubMed ID: 3681187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Two types of pigeon key pecking: suppression of long- but not short-duration key pecks by duration-dependent shock. Schwartz B J Exp Anal Behav; 1977 Mar; 27(2):393-8. PubMed ID: 16812001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Drugs and punished responding. II. d-Amphetamine-induced increases in punished responding. Foree DD; Moretz FH; McMillan DE J Exp Anal Behav; 1973 Sep; 20(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 4752089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interresponse-time punishment: a basis for shock-maintained behavior. Galbicka G; Platt JR J Exp Anal Behav; 1984 May; 41(3):291-308. PubMed ID: 6736858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of contingent auditory stimuli on concurrent schedule performance: an alternative punisher to electric shock. Reed P; Yoshino T Behav Processes; 2008 Jul; 78(3):421-8. PubMed ID: 18406078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Punishment and the potential for negative reinforcement with histamine injection. Mayer PCM; de Carvalho Neto MB; Katz JL J Exp Anal Behav; 2018 Mar; 109(2):365-379. PubMed ID: 29485718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Behavior simultaneously maintained by both presentation and termination of noxious stimuli. Barrett JE; Spealman RD J Exp Anal Behav; 1978 May; 29(3):375-83. PubMed ID: 16812064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A facilitative effect of punishment on unpunished behavior. BRETHOWER DM; REYNOLDS GS J Exp Anal Behav; 1962 Apr; 5(2):191-9. PubMed ID: 13872895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reversal of preference under progressive-ratio schedules by punishment. Dardano JF J Exp Anal Behav; 1968 Mar; 11(2):133-46. PubMed ID: 5645869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Conjunctive schedules of reinforcement. I. Rate-dependent effects of pentobarbital and d-amphetamine. Barrett JE J Exp Anal Behav; 1974 Nov; 22(3):561-73. PubMed ID: 4436616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]