These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16812538)

  • 1. Information on response requirements compared with information on food density as a reinforcer of observing in pigeons.
    Dinsmoor JA; Bowe CA; Green L; Hanson J
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1988 Mar; 49(2):229-37. PubMed ID: 16812538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mechanisms underlying the effects of unsignaled delayed reinforcement on key pecking of pigeons under variable-interval schedules.
    Schaal DW; Shahan TA; Kovera CA; Reilly MP
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1998 Mar; 69(2):103-22. PubMed ID: 9540229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Behavioral momentum and accumulation of mass in multiple schedules.
    Craig AR; Cunningham PJ; Shahan TA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 May; 103(3):437-49. PubMed ID: 25787824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of a response-reinforcer relation on elicited pecking.
    Steffen P; Liguori A; Marcucella H
    Behav Processes; 1990 Jun; 21(2-3):197-203. PubMed ID: 24925850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A test of the negative discriminative stimulus as a reinforcer of observing.
    Dinsmoor JA; Browne MP; Lawrence CE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1972 Jul; 18(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 16811620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On conditioned reinforcing effects of negative discriminative stimuli.
    Allen KD; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1989 Nov; 52(3):335-9. PubMed ID: 16812600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Drug effects on responding maintained by stimulus-reinforcer and response-reinforcer contingencies.
    Spealman RD; Katz JL; Witkin JM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1978 Sep; 30(2):187-96. PubMed ID: 702026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Separating the effects of salience and disparity on the rate of observing.
    Dinsmoor JA; Bowe CA; Dout DL; Martin LT; Mueller KL; Workman JD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1983 Nov; 40(3):253-64. PubMed ID: 16812348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The relationship between observing behavior and food-key response rates under mixed and multiple schedules of reinforcement.
    Hirota TT
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1974 Mar; 21(2):259-66. PubMed ID: 16811743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pigeon performance on a variable-interval omission schedule at different levels of food deprivation.
    Lewis P; Dougherty DM
    Behav Processes; 1992; 27(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 24896464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Punishment of observing by the negative discriminative stimulus.
    Mulvaney DE; Dinsmoor JA; Jwaideh AR; Hughes LH
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1974 Jan; 21(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 16811733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The delay-reduction hypothesis of conditioned reinforcement and punishment: Observing behavior.
    Case DA; Fantino E
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1981 Jan; 35(1):93-108. PubMed ID: 16812203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stimulus control of schedule-induced activity in pigeons during multiple schedules.
    Buzzard JH; Hake DF
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1984 Sep; 42(2):191-209. PubMed ID: 16812385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of chlorpromazine on food-maintained and observing behavior.
    Dearing ME; Branch MN
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1981; 73(3):281-5. PubMed ID: 6787650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Testing the reinforcing properties of S-: a replication of Lieberman's procedure.
    Mueller KL; Dinsmoor JA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1984 Jan; 41(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 6699539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Changeover behavior and preference in concurrent schedules.
    Williams BA; Bell MC
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1996 May; 65(3):513-26. PubMed ID: 16812807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Key pecking of pigeons under variable-interval schedules of briefly signaled delayed reinforcement: effects of variable-interval value.
    Schaal DW; Schuh KJ; Branch MN
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1992 Sep; 58(2):277-86. PubMed ID: 1402602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The effects of stimulus duration, component duration, and schedule of stimulus presentation on the observing response in rats].
    Hachiya S; Ito M
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1991 Oct; 62(4):235-43. PubMed ID: 1806680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Yoked variable-ratio and variable-interval responding in pigeons.
    Catania AC; Matthews TJ; Silverman PJ; Yohalem R
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1977 Sep; 28(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 16812022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Disruption of responding maintained by conditioned reinforcement: alterations in response-conditioned-reinforcer relations.
    Lieving GA; Reilly MP; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2006 Sep; 86(2):197-209. PubMed ID: 17002227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.