These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16812577)

  • 1. Sensitivity of time allocation to an overall reinforcer rate feedback function in concurrent interval schedules.
    Davison M; Kerr A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1989 Mar; 51(2):215-31. PubMed ID: 16812577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Concurrent variable-interval schedule performance: Fixed versus mixed reinforcer durations.
    Davison M; Hogsden I
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1984 Mar; 41(2):169-82. PubMed ID: 16812365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Concurrent schedules: Interaction of reinforcer frequency and reinforcer duration.
    Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1988 May; 49(3):339-49. PubMed ID: 16812544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sensitivity to relative reinforcer rate in concurrent schedules: independence from relative and absolute reinforcer duration.
    McLean AP; Blampied NM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 Jan; 75(1):25-42. PubMed ID: 11256865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Choosing among multiple alternatives: Relative and overall reinforcer rates.
    Beeby E; Alsop B
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Sep; 108(2):204-222. PubMed ID: 28758210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Concurrent variable-interval variable-ratio schedules can provide only weak evidence for matching.
    Ziriax JM; Silberberg A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1984 Jan; 41(1):83-100. PubMed ID: 16812360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Concurrent-schedule performance: Effects of relative and overall reinforcer rate.
    Alsop B; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1988 Jan; 49(1):21-36. PubMed ID: 16812530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Variable-ratio versus variable-interval schedules: response rate, resistance to change, and preference.
    Nevin JA; Randolph ; Holland S; McLean AP
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 Jul; 76(1):43-74. PubMed ID: 11516115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the joint control of preference by time and reinforcer-ratio variation.
    Davison M; Cowie S; Elliffe D
    Behav Processes; 2013 May; 95():100-12. PubMed ID: 23410902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sensitivity to reinforcer duration in a self-control procedure.
    White KG; Pipe ME
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1987 Sep; 48(2):235-49. PubMed ID: 16812491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preference for unsegmented interreinforcement intervals in concurrent chains.
    Leung JP; Winton AS
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1985 Jul; 44(1):89-101. PubMed ID: 16812428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Concurrent schedules: reinforcer magnitude effects.
    Landon J; Davison M; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 May; 79(3):351-65. PubMed ID: 12908762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Behavior-dependent reinforcer-rate changes in concurrent schedules: A further analysis.
    Davison M; Alsop B
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Jul; 56(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 16812639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Every reinforcer counts: reinforcer magnitude and local preference.
    Davison M; Baum WM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Jul; 80(1):95-129. PubMed ID: 13677611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reinforcer-ratio variation and its effects on rate of adaptation.
    Landon J; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 Mar; 75(2):207-34. PubMed ID: 11394487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Concurrent choice: Effects of overall reinforcer rate and the temporal distribution of reinforcers.
    Elliffe D; Alsop B
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1996 Mar; 65(2):445-63. PubMed ID: 16812806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does sensitivity to magnitude depend on the temporal distribution of reinforcement?
    Grace RC; Bragason O
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 Mar; 83(2):169-84. PubMed ID: 15828593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Local preference in concurrent schedules: the effects of reinforcer sequences.
    Krägeloh CU; Davison M; Elliffe DM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 Jul; 84(1):37-64. PubMed ID: 16156136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Changeover behavior and preference in concurrent schedules.
    Williams BA; Bell MC
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1996 May; 65(3):513-26. PubMed ID: 16812807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Concurrent schedules: short- and long-term effects of reinforcers.
    Landon J; Davison M; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 May; 77(3):257-71. PubMed ID: 12083679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.