These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16812682)

  • 1. Effects of differences between stimuli, responses, and reinforcer rates on conditional discrimination performance.
    Nevin JA; Cate H; Alsop B
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1993 Jan; 59(1):147-61. PubMed ID: 16812682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modeling choice across time: Effects of response-reinforcer discriminability.
    Davison M; Cowie S
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2022 Jan; 117(1):36-52. PubMed ID: 34734651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Control by past and present stimuli depends on the discriminated reinforcer differential.
    Cowie S; Davison M; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Sep; 108(2):184-203. PubMed ID: 28940396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The interaction between stimulus and reinforcer control on remembering.
    McCarthy DC; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Jul; 56(1):51-66. PubMed ID: 1940763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reinforcer frequency and restricted stimulus control.
    Dube WV; McIlvane WJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1997 Nov; 68(3):303-16. PubMed ID: 9375385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does overall reinforcer rate affect discrimination of time-based contingencies?
    Cowie S; Davison M; Blumhardt L; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2016 May; 105(3):393-408. PubMed ID: 27151836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Concurrent-schedule performance: Effects of relative and overall reinforcer rate.
    Alsop B; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1988 Jan; 49(1):21-36. PubMed ID: 16812530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Concurrent-schedule performance in transition: changeover delays and signaled reinforcer ratios.
    Krägeloh CU; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Jan; 79(1):87-109. PubMed ID: 12696743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Timing compound stimuli: Relative reinforcer probabilities divide stimulus control in the multiple peak procedure.
    Gomes-Ng S; Elliffe D; Cowie S
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2020 Apr; 46(2):124-138. PubMed ID: 31804106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sensitivity to relative reinforcer rate in concurrent schedules: independence from relative and absolute reinforcer duration.
    McLean AP; Blampied NM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 Jan; 75(1):25-42. PubMed ID: 11256865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of relative reinforcer frequency on complex color detection.
    Davison M; McCarthy D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1989 May; 51(3):291-315. PubMed ID: 16812580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Divided stimulus control: Which key did you peck, or what color was it?
    Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2018 Jan; 109(1):107-124. PubMed ID: 29194638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sensitivity of conditional-discrimination performance to within-session variation of reinforcer frequency.
    Ward RD; Odum AL
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2008 Nov; 90(3):301-11. PubMed ID: 19070338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A model for discriminating reinforcers in time and space.
    Cowie S; Davison M; Elliffe D
    Behav Processes; 2016 Jun; 127():62-73. PubMed ID: 27016156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Associative interaction: joint control of key pecking by stimulus-reinforcer and response-reinforcer relationships.
    Woodruff G; Conner N; Gamzu E; Williams DR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1977 Sep; 28(2):133-44. PubMed ID: 16812020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of the stimulus-reinforcer correlation in a discrete-trials IRT>t procedure.
    Wessells MG
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1979 May; 31(3):307-20. PubMed ID: 16812133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Delayed matching-to-sample performance: Effects of relative reinforcer frequency and of signaled versus unsignaled reinforcer magnitudes.
    McCarthy D; Voss P
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1995 Jan; 63(1):33-51. PubMed ID: 16812751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Behavioral momentum and accumulation of mass in multiple schedules.
    Craig AR; Cunningham PJ; Shahan TA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 May; 103(3):437-49. PubMed ID: 25787824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Suboptimal choice in pigeons: Choice is primarily based on the value of the conditioned reinforcer rather than overall reinforcement rate.
    Smith AP; Zentall TR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2016 Apr; 42(2):212-20. PubMed ID: 26881902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Autoshaping the pigeon's gape response: acquisition and topography as a function of reinforcer type and magnitude.
    Allan RW; Zeigler HP
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1994 Sep; 62(2):201-23. PubMed ID: 7964365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.