These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Choice in situations of time-based diminishing returns: immediate versus delayed consequences of action. Hackenberg TD; Hineline PN J Exp Anal Behav; 1992 Jan; 57(1):67-80. PubMed ID: 1548449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of Mands on Instructional Control: A Laboratory Simulation. Miller JR; Hirst JM; Kaplan BA; DiGennaro Reed FD; Reed DD Anal Verbal Behav; 2014 Oct; 30(2):100-12. PubMed ID: 27275405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effects of response-cost punishment on instructional control during a choice task. Fox AE; Pietras CJ J Exp Anal Behav; 2013 May; 99(3):346-61. PubMed ID: 23408327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Human choice in "counterintuitive" situations: fixed- versus progressive-ratio schedules. Wanchisen BA; Tatham TA; Hineline PN J Exp Anal Behav; 1992 Jul; 58(1):67-85. PubMed ID: 1645102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of reinforcement and response-cost history on instructional control. Nergaard SK; Couto KC J Exp Anal Behav; 2021 May; 115(3):679-701. PubMed ID: 33634471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pigeons' choices between fixed-ratio and linear or geometric escalating schedules. Neuman P; Ahearn WH; Hineline PN J Exp Anal Behav; 2000 Jan; 73(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 10682342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Molar optimization versus delayed reinforcement as explanations of choice between fixed-ratio and progressive-ratio schedules. Mazur JE; Vaughan W J Exp Anal Behav; 1987 Sep; 48(2):251-61. PubMed ID: 3681185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of response variability on the sensitivity of rule-governed behavior. Joyce JH; Chase PN J Exp Anal Behav; 1990 Nov; 54(3):251-62. PubMed ID: 16812623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Schedule sensitivity in human operant behavior: instructed versus shaped verbal behavior]. Kimoto K; Shimamune S; Jitsumori M Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1989 Dec; 60(5):290-6. PubMed ID: 2635229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of social context, reinforcer probability, and reinforcer magnitude on humans' choices to compete or not to compete. Dougherty DM; Cherek DR J Exp Anal Behav; 1994 Jul; 62(1):133-48. PubMed ID: 8064209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rule-governed behavior and sensitivity to changing consequences of responding. Hayes SC; Brownstein AJ; Zettle RD; Rosenfarb I; Korn Z J Exp Anal Behav; 1986 May; 45(3):237-56. PubMed ID: 16812448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Uninstructed human responding: Sensitivity of low-rate performance to schedule contingencies. Shimoff E; Catania AC; Matthews BA J Exp Anal Behav; 1981 Sep; 36(2):207-20. PubMed ID: 16812240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effects of a variety of instructions on human fixed-interval performance. Lefrancois JR; Chase PN; Joyce JH J Exp Anal Behav; 1988 May; 49(3):383-93. PubMed ID: 16812546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Varying the costs of sunk costs: optimal and non-optimal choices in a sunk-cost task with humans. Avila R; Yankelevitz RL; Gonzalez JC; Hackenberg TD J Exp Anal Behav; 2013 Sep; 100(2):165-73. PubMed ID: 24019009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Function-Altering Effects of Rule Phrasing in the Modulation of Instructional Control. Henley AJ; Hirst JM; DiGennaro Reed FD; Becirevic A; Reed DD Anal Verbal Behav; 2017 Jun; 33(1):24-40. PubMed ID: 30854285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Tests of transitivity in choices between fixed and variable reinforcer delays. Mazur JE; Coe D J Exp Anal Behav; 1987 May; 47(3):287-97. PubMed ID: 3612019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]