These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16812774)

  • 1. Assessing preference for reinforcers using demand curves, work-rate functions, and expansion paths.
    Tustin RD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1995 Nov; 64(3):313-29. PubMed ID: 16812774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Revealed preference between reinforcers used to examine hypotheses about behavioral consistencies.
    Tustin D
    Behav Modif; 2000 Jul; 24(3):411-24. PubMed ID: 10881385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Earning and obtaining reinforcers under concurrent interval scheduling.
    MacDonall JS
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 Sep; 84(2):167-83. PubMed ID: 16262185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Preference and resistance to change with constant- and variable-duration terminal links: independence of reinforcement rate and magnitude.
    Grace RC; Bedell MA; Nevin JA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 May; 77(3):233-55. PubMed ID: 12083678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How do reinforcers affect choice? Preference pulses after responses and reinforcers.
    Gomes-Ng S; Elliffe D; Cowie S
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Jul; 108(1):17-38. PubMed ID: 28573713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tests of behavioral-economic assessments of relative reinforcer efficacy II: economic complements.
    Madden GJ; Smethells JR; Ewan EE; Hursh SR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2007 Nov; 88(3):355-67. PubMed ID: 18047226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pigeons' demand and preference for specific and generalized conditioned reinforcers in a token economy.
    Tan L; Hackenberg TD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Nov; 104(3):296-314. PubMed ID: 26676183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Concurrent choice: Effects of overall reinforcer rate and the temporal distribution of reinforcers.
    Elliffe D; Alsop B
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1996 Mar; 65(2):445-63. PubMed ID: 16812806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Short-term and long-term effects of reinforcers on choice.
    Buckner RL; Green L; Myerson J
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1993 Mar; 59(2):293-307. PubMed ID: 16812687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tests of behavioral-economic assessments of relative reinforcer efficacy: economic substitutes.
    Madden GJ; Smethells JR; Ewan EE; Hursh SR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2007 Mar; 87(2):219-40. PubMed ID: 17465313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preference for and effects of variable-as opposed to fixed-reinforcer duration.
    Essock SM; Reese EP
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1974 Jan; 21(1):89-97. PubMed ID: 16811736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sensitivity to relative reinforcer rate in concurrent schedules: independence from relative and absolute reinforcer duration.
    McLean AP; Blampied NM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 Jan; 75(1):25-42. PubMed ID: 11256865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Concurrent schedules: short- and long-term effects of reinforcers.
    Landon J; Davison M; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 May; 77(3):257-71. PubMed ID: 12083679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Choosing among multiple alternatives: Relative and overall reinforcer rates.
    Beeby E; Alsop B
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Sep; 108(2):204-222. PubMed ID: 28758210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does the terminal-link effect depend on duration or reinforcement rate?
    Grace RC; Bragason O
    Behav Processes; 2004 Jul; 67(1):67-79. PubMed ID: 15182927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Choice between single and multiple reinforcers in concurrent-chains schedules.
    Mazur JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2006 Sep; 86(2):211-22. PubMed ID: 17002228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Every reinforcer counts: reinforcer magnitude and local preference.
    Davison M; Baum WM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Jul; 80(1):95-129. PubMed ID: 13677611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of work-reinforcer schedules on performance and preference in students with autism.
    Bukala M; Hu MY; Lee R; Ward-Horner JC; Fienup DM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2015; 48(1):215-20. PubMed ID: 25688839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Local preference in concurrent schedules: the effects of reinforcer sequences.
    Krägeloh CU; Davison M; Elliffe DM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 Jul; 84(1):37-64. PubMed ID: 16156136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preference and resistance to change with constant-duration schedule components.
    Nevin JA; Grace RC
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2000 Jul; 74(1):79-100. PubMed ID: 10966097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.