These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16812806)

  • 1. Concurrent choice: Effects of overall reinforcer rate and the temporal distribution of reinforcers.
    Elliffe D; Alsop B
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1996 Mar; 65(2):445-63. PubMed ID: 16812806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Concurrent-schedule performance: Effects of relative and overall reinforcer rate.
    Alsop B; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1988 Jan; 49(1):21-36. PubMed ID: 16812530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sensitivity to relative reinforcer rate in concurrent schedules: independence from relative and absolute reinforcer duration.
    McLean AP; Blampied NM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 Jan; 75(1):25-42. PubMed ID: 11256865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sensitivity to reinforcement in concurrent arithmetic and exponential schedules.
    Taylor R; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1983 Jan; 39(1):191-8. PubMed ID: 16812309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Concurrent variable-interval schedule performance: Fixed versus mixed reinforcer durations.
    Davison M; Hogsden I
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1984 Mar; 41(2):169-82. PubMed ID: 16812365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does sensitivity to magnitude depend on the temporal distribution of reinforcement?
    Grace RC; Bragason O
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 Mar; 83(2):169-84. PubMed ID: 15828593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Behavior-dependent reinforcer-rate changes in concurrent schedules: A further analysis.
    Davison M; Alsop B
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Jul; 56(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 16812639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Concurrent schedules: reinforcer magnitude effects.
    Landon J; Davison M; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 May; 79(3):351-65. PubMed ID: 12908762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Closed-economy multiple-schedule performance: Effects of deprivation and session duration.
    Elliffe D; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1996 Jan; 65(1):111-28. PubMed ID: 16812778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Concurrent schedules: Interaction of reinforcer frequency and reinforcer duration.
    Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1988 May; 49(3):339-49. PubMed ID: 16812544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Steady-state choice between four alternatives obeys the constant-ratio rule.
    Bensemann J; Lobb B; Podlesnik CA; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Jul; 104(1):7-19. PubMed ID: 25989016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Choice between response units: The rate constancy model.
    Zeiler MD; Blakely TF
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1983 Mar; 39(2):275-91. PubMed ID: 16812320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Concurrent variable-interval variable-ratio schedules can provide only weak evidence for matching.
    Ziriax JM; Silberberg A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1984 Jan; 41(1):83-100. PubMed ID: 16812360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of problem difficulty and reinforcer quality on time allocated to concurrent arithmetic problems.
    Mace FC; Neef NA; Shade D; Mauro BC
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1996; 29(1):11-24. PubMed ID: 8881341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the joint control of preference by time and reinforcer-ratio variation.
    Davison M; Cowie S; Elliffe D
    Behav Processes; 2013 May; 95():100-12. PubMed ID: 23410902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Local preference in concurrent schedules: the effects of reinforcer sequences.
    Krägeloh CU; Davison M; Elliffe DM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 Jul; 84(1):37-64. PubMed ID: 16156136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Choosing among multiple alternatives: Relative and overall reinforcer rates.
    Beeby E; Alsop B
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Sep; 108(2):204-222. PubMed ID: 28758210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Concurrent schedules: discriminating reinforcer-ratio reversals at a fixed time after the previous reinforcer.
    Cowie S; Elliffe D; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2013 Sep; 100(2):117-34. PubMed ID: 23943395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Zebrafish choice behavior is sensitive to reinforcer rate, immediacy, and magnitude ratios.
    Kuroda T; Ritchey CM; Podlesnik CA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2021 Sep; 116(2):182-207. PubMed ID: 34223635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sensitivity of time allocation to an overall reinforcer rate feedback function in concurrent interval schedules.
    Davison M; Kerr A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1989 Mar; 51(2):215-31. PubMed ID: 16812577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.