These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16812810)

  • 1. Blocking, unblocking, and overexpectation in autoshaping with pigeons.
    Khallad Y; Moore J
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1996 May; 65(3):575-91. PubMed ID: 16812810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of pecking generated by serial, delay, and trace autoshaping procedures.
    Newlin RJ; Lolordo VM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1976 Mar; 25(2):227-41. PubMed ID: 16811907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Autoshaping as a function of prior food presentations.
    Downing K; Neuringer A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1976 Nov; 26(3):463-9. PubMed ID: 16811961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Acquisition of the autoshaped key peck as a function of amount of preliminary magazine training.
    Steinhauer GD; Davol GH; Lee A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1976 May; 25(3):355-9. PubMed ID: 16811919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of amygdala lesions on overexpectation phenomena in food cup approach and autoshaping procedures.
    Holland PC
    Behav Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 130(4):357-75. PubMed ID: 27176564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How competitive is cue competition?
    Packheiser J; Pusch R; Stein CC; Güntürkün O; Lachnit H; Uengoer M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Jan; 73(1):104-114. PubMed ID: 31307281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Resurgence of time allocation.
    Cançado CRX; Lattal KA; Carpenter HK; Solley EA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Nov; 108(3):398-413. PubMed ID: 29105098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Discrimination and differentiation of response number in stimulus directed pecking of pigeons.
    Dodd PW
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1980 Mar; 33(2):253-64. PubMed ID: 7365408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of reinforcement upon the prepecking behaviors of pigeons in the autoshaping experiment.
    Wessells MG
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1974 Jan; 21(1):125-44. PubMed ID: 16811726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Autoshaping the pigeon's gape response: acquisition and topography as a function of reinforcer type and magnitude.
    Allan RW; Zeigler HP
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1994 Sep; 62(2):201-23. PubMed ID: 7964365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Species-specific response-topography of chickens' and pigeons' water-induced autoshaped responding.
    Ploog BO
    Behav Processes; 2014 Jul; 106():5-11. PubMed ID: 24704490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Choice as a dependent measure in autoshaping: sensitivity to frequency and duration of food presentation.
    Picker M; Poling A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1982 May; 37(3):393-406. PubMed ID: 7097152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. "Automaintenance": the role of reinforcement.
    Hursh SR; Navarick DJ; Fantino E
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1974 Jan; 21(1):117-24. PubMed ID: 16811725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does conditional discrimination learning by pigeons necessarily involve hierarchical relationships?
    Thomas DR; Schmidt EK
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1989 Nov; 52(3):249-60. PubMed ID: 16812596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Joint stimulus control in a temporal discrimination task.
    Pinto C; Fortes I; Machado A
    Anim Cogn; 2017 Nov; 20(6):1129-1136. PubMed ID: 28914387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recovery of Pavlovian sign-tracking (autoshaping) following the discontinuation of inter-trial interval food in rats.
    Kearns DN; Weiss SJ
    Behav Processes; 2007 Jul; 75(3):307-11. PubMed ID: 17507179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Errorless discrimination established by differential autoshaping.
    Wilkie DM; Ramer DG
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1974 Sep; 22(2):333-40. PubMed ID: 16811797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stimulus- and response-reinforcer contingencies in autoshaping, operant, classical, and omission training procedures in rats.
    Atnip GW
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1977 Jul; 28(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 16812014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differential autoshaping to common and distinctive elements of positive and negative discriminative stimuli.
    Wasserman EA; Anderson PA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1974 Nov; 22(3):491-6. PubMed ID: 16811812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Discriminative stimulus effects of combinations of drug and visual stimuli in pigeons.
    Schaal DW; Jewett DC; Schuh KJ
    Behav Pharmacol; 1994 Oct; 5(6):630-636. PubMed ID: 11224243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.